In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking ordinances. A petition entitled "Petition for Statewide Smoking Restriction" is being circulated to voters by campaign workers who ask only, "Do you want to sign a petition for statewide smoking restriction?" The petition advocates a state law banning smoking in most retail establishments and in government offices that are open to the public.
Which of the following circumstances would make the petition as circulated misleading to voters who understand the proposal as extending the local ordinances statewide?
不是很同意楼上的人的看法: 段落的最后一句话是 The petition advocates a state law banning smoking in most retail establishments and in government offices that are open to the public,问题是:make the petition as circulated misleading to voters who understand the proposal as extending the local ordinances statewide?既然是与extending the local ordinances statewide有关,那么就不能使法规的有效范围成为让人误解的漏洞,因为petition仅仅advocate areas open to public,所以我觉得应该是B