ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Editorial in Krenlandian Newspaper:Krenland's steelmakers are losing domestic sales because of lower-priced imports, in many cases because foreign governments subsidize their steel industries in ways that are banned by international treaties. But whatever the cause, the cost is ultimately going to be jobs in Krenland's steel industry. Therefore, it would protect not only steel companies but also industrial employment in Krenland if our government took measures to reduce cheap steel imports.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the editorial's argument?

正确答案: C

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4718

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2856|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教GWD 9-28

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-7-12 20:55:00 | 显示全部楼层
the cost is ultimately going to be jobs in Krenland’s steel industry.

这句话不明白,谁给解释一下
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2026-9-23 11:17
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2026 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部