纠结了半晚上 早晨看还是云里雾里 大全2-5 谁能帮我看看~~

Bensontuo

Core of the argument:

Conclusion:

City's public transportation should be removed from the jurisdiction of the municipal government, politically impossible either to raise fares or to institute cost saving reduction in service.

PT handled by a private firm ---> profit will pursued ---> Not necessary for covering operating costs with government funds.

A. Could be true, could not be true.

B. so, apparently, based on the information offered, the reason why PT has to be removed from the jurisdiction of the municipal government is because we need to ensure it is politically " possible to raise fares " and " to institute cost - saving reduction in service.

In that sense, the assumption here is that private firm will be political possible to both raise fares and institute cost saving reduction in service.

C. The core of the argument is not about whether private firm could receive the public fund or not but about whether it could raise the profit to cover the operating cost without " compensating the public cost with government funds.

So, we need to ensure what is " sufficient conditions " that ensure private firm to boost up the profit.