ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

In Berinia, the age at which people could begin to drink alcohol legally used to be 18. In 1990, in an attempt to reduce alcohol consumption and thereby to reduce alcohol-related traffic deaths among Berinians under 21, the legal drinking age was raised to 21. Alcohol-related traffic deaths among people under 21 have decreased significantly since 1990. Nevertheless, surveys show that people in that age-group drink just as much alcohol as they did before 1990.

Which of the following, if true of Berinia, most helps to resolve the apparent discrepancy?

正确答案: B

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4716

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2420|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]天山4-28看了讨论还是不服

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-5-5 21:09:00 | 显示全部楼层
The problem with C is that:
X = total number of people under 21 in Berinia
Y% = total percent of people who drinks (remains relatively constant)
A% = total percent of car owners under the 21 BEFORE the change in legal drinking age
B% = total percent of car owners under the 21 AFTER the change

The amount of people who can drink and drive before: X * Y * A
The amount of people who can drink and drive after: X * Y * B
Based on the condition that B > A we can conclude that after > before, doesn't explain the decrease in alcohol-related traffic death.
沙发
发表于 2006-5-6 10:47:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excellent, =)
板凳
发表于 2006-5-6 12:48:00 | 显示全部楼层
I always figure out the constant factors first, stop paying attention to them and then focus on what's changed.  Without listing out the formulas, you can figure out that X and Y remained constant.  So focus on the only thing that changed (car owners) and see how it affects the overall result (accidents).
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-9-5 20:04
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部