- UID
- 360484
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2008-7-21
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
大家好,
最近复习作文的时候,对两类错误类型的攻击不是很清楚,想请教下大家
在七宗罪和各类模板,最常见的两类罪行就是causaloversimplification和GratuitousAssumption
举个例子:
The following appeared in an Excelsior Company memorandum.
The Excelsior Company plans to introduce its own brand of coffee. Since coffee is an expensive food item, and since there are
already many established brands of coffee, the best way to gain customers for the Excelsior brand is to do what Superior, the
leading coffee company, did when it introduced the newest brand in its line of coffees: conduct a temporary sales promotion that
offers free samples, price reductions, and discount coupons for the new brand.
我的错误因果段是这么写的:
Superior's promotion plan 的成功并不能成为他们自己的plan也会成功的原因。也许customers just tend to trust leading companies for no reasons, no matter what they sell (无脑跟风). 又或者是 there are not too much choices on the market at that time when Superior established the new brand.
但是如果转换成无端假设,似乎也说的通:
The author falsely rests on gratuitous assumption that Superior's promotion plan 成功,他们自己的plan也会成功 . no evidence is stated inthe argument to support this assumption. 然后我接上面一段的两个可能的原因:也许customers just tend to trust leading companies for no reasons, no matter what they sell (无脑跟风). 又或者是 there are not too much choices on the market at that time when Superior established the new brand.
这么看来,是不是错误因果,和无端假设可以通用?还是我的逻辑不对?练习时碰到类似的原因,总是纠结到底用哪种。一般就看到两个类似的原因,然后随机分配,一个写成因果,一个写成假设。但我怕自己搞错,所以尽量写其他罪行,只挑一个因果或者假设来写。
请指教
多谢各位NN |
|