ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 7860|回复: 10
打印 上一主题 下一主题

天山 7-4 好像没有人问过

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-3-9 10:51:00 | 只看该作者

天山 7-4 好像没有人问过

The idea that equipping homes
with electrical appliances and other
“modern” household technologies
Line would eliminate drudgery, save labor
(5) time, and increase leisure for women
who were full-time home workers
remained largely unchallenged until
the women’s movement of the 1970’s
spawned the groundbreaking and
(10) influential works of sociologist Joann
Vanek and historian Ruth Cowan.
Vanek analyzed 40 years of timeuse
surveys conducted by home
economists to argue that electrical
(15) appliances and other modern household
technologies reduced the effort
required to perform specific tasks,
but ownership of these appliances did
not correlate with less time spent on
(20) housework by full-time home workers.
In fact, time spent by these workers
remained remarkably constant? at
about 52 to 54 hours per week? from
the 1920’s to the 1960’s, a period
(25) of significant change in household
technology. In surveying two
centuries of household technology
in the United States, Cowan argued
that the “industrialization” of the home
(30) often resulted in more work for full-time
home workers because the use of
such devices as coal stoves, water
pumps, and vacuum cleaners tended
to reduce the workload of married-
(35) women’s helpers (husbands, sons,
daughters, and servants) while
promoting a more rigorous standard
of housework. The full-time home
worker’s duties also shifted to include
15
(40) more household management, child
care, and the post-Second World War
phenomenon of being “Mom’s taxi.”


4.According to the passage, which of the following is true about the idea mentioned in line 1?


A. It has been undermined by data found in time-use survey conducted by home economists


E. It inaccurately suggested that new household technologies would reduce the effort required to perform housework.


Ans: A


A是答案没有问题,但是E错在什么地方呢?是因为Idea只提及消除枯燥,节省时间,增加休闲而没有涉及到effort to perform housework么?


请NN指教

沙发
发表于 2005-3-10 13:45:00 | 只看该作者


A是答案没有问题,但是E错在什么地方呢?是因为Idea只提及消除枯燥,节省时间,增加休闲而没有涉及到effort to perform housework么?



是的。事实上,文章的作者小心地回避了effort这个问题而用time来衡量technologies的效果;通篇看来没有提到effort;而且我们知道,reduction of the effort确实是事实,而决不是inaccurately suggested...
板凳
发表于 2005-6-23 08:05:00 | 只看该作者

thank you! xealot! what you explained solved this problem quite well.

地板
发表于 2005-8-27 17:10:00 | 只看该作者
怎么没有答案?在哪里可以下载天山答案呀?
5#
发表于 2005-9-4 00:20:00 | 只看该作者

what's wrong in  q4-choice B, thanks.


B. It was based on a definition of housework that was explicitly rejected by Vanek and Cowan.

6#
发表于 2005-10-16 23:37:00 | 只看该作者
A中的“survey conducted by home economists”,跟文中的“works of sociologist Joann Vanek and historian Ruth Cowan.”不符啊?应该是不对的吧?
7#
发表于 2005-10-21 00:28:00 | 只看该作者

Vanek analyzed 40 years of timeuse
surveys conducted by home
economists to
argue that electrical
(15) appliances and other modern household
technologies reduced the effort
required to perform specific tasks
,
but ownership of these appliances did
not correlate with less time spent on
(20) housework by full-time home workers.


蓝色字体部分:说的就是A,这些home economist的survey数据恰恰反驳了LINE 1的内容


红色字体说明。effort还是少了的。

8#
发表于 2006-7-16 14:36:00 | 只看该作者
注意问题的问法,是关于line1,不是第一句。且单位工作的effort少了,不能证明总时间少了,排除E
9#
发表于 2007-6-18 22:23:00 | 只看该作者

Vanek 與 Cowan並不是提出" definitioin of housework"的錯誤

而是指出時間花費並沒有減少

所以B選項是錯誤的

10#
发表于 2008-12-29 00:07:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用xealot在2005-3-10 13:45:00的发言:


A是答案没有问题,但是E错在什么地方呢?是因为Idea只提及消除枯燥,节省时间,增加休闲而没有涉及到effort to perform housework么?



是的。事实上,文章的作者小心地回避了effort这个问题而用time来衡量technologies的效果;通篇看来没有提到effort;而且我们知道,reduction of the effort确实是事实,而决不是inaccurately suggested...

3X    好阴险

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-5-8 21:22
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部