ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1352|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]gwd 7-37 倒计时3天求助!!

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-2-23 12:05:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]gwd 7-37 倒计时3天求助!!

Firms traditionally claim that they


       downsize (i.e., make permanent


       personnel cuts) for economic reasons,


laying off supposedly unnecessary staff


  (5)      in an attempt to become more efficient


and competitive.  Organization theory


would explain this reasoning as an


example of the “economic rationality”


that it assumes underlies all organi-


(10)       zational activities.  There is evidence


that firms believe they are behaving


rationally whenever they downsize; yet


recent research has shown that the


actual economic effects of downsizing


(15)      are often negative for firms.  Thus,


organization theory cannot adequately


explain downsizing; non-economic


factors must also be considered.


One such factor is the evolution of


(20)       downsizing into a powerful business


       myth:  managers simply believe that


       downsizing is efficacious.  Moreover,


downsizing nowadays is greeted


favorably by the business press; the


(25)      press often refers to soaring stock


prices of downsizing firms (even though


research shows that stocks usually


rise only briefly after downsizing and


then suffer a prolonged decline).


(30)      Once viewed as a sign of desperation,


downsizing is now viewed as a signal


that firms are serious about competing


       in the global marketplace; such signals


are received positively by key actors—


(35)       financial analysts, consultants,


shareholders—who supply firms with


vital organizing resources.  Thus, even


if downsizers do not become economi-


      cally more efficient, downsizing’s mythic


(40)      properties give them added prestige


in the business community, enhancing


their survival prospects.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


GWD-7-Q37:


According to the passage, the “key actors” (line 34) view a firm’s downsizing activities as an indication of the firm’s




  • troubled financial condition


  • inability to develop effective long-term strategies


  • inability to retain vital organizational resources


  • desire to boost its stock price


  • desire to become more competitive

  • why B? my answer is E.

    沙发
    发表于 2005-2-25 19:08:00 | 只看该作者

    E is correct.

    GOOD LUCK!

    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

    Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

    手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-13 22:38
    京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

    ChaseDream 论坛

    © 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

    返回顶部