Q40: It is illegal to advertise prescription medications in Hedland except directly to physicians, either by mail or in medical journals. A proposed law would allow general advertising of prescription medications. Opponents object that the general population lacks the specialized knowledge to evaluate these advertising claims and might ask their physicians for inappropriate medications. But since physicians have the final say as to whether to prescribe a medication for a patient, the objection provides no grounds for concern. Which of the following would it be most useful to establish in order to evaluate the argument? A. Whether nonprescription medications can interact with any of the prescription medications that could be advertised to the general public and block the action of those prescription medications B. Whether some people might go to a physician for no reason other than to ask for a particular medication they have seen advertised C. Whether the proposed law requires prescription-medication advertisements directed to the general public to provide the same information as do advertisements directed to physicians D. Whether physicians are more likely to pay attention to advertising directed to the general public than to advertising directed to physicians E. Whether physicians are likely to succumb to pressure from patients to prescribe inappropriate medications Answer: E 这道题反方的观点认为病人看药品广告没有意义因为他们买药都要咨询医生的意见。如果能知道病人买药前是否一定会找医生咨询，就可以证明反方的观点是否站的住脚了。所以我觉得答案应该是B. E所述的医生是否给正确的建议只会影响病人买对或是买错药，不会影响广告对病人是否产生作用，所以应该是无关选项。 大家觉得呢？
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2005-2-19 19:01:00
