ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2138|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全-I-16

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-2-15 15:42:00 | 只看该作者

大全-I-16

Local phone companies have monopolies on phone service within their areas. Cable television can be transmitted via the wires that are already in place and owned by the phone companies. Cable television companies argue that if the telephone companies were to offer cable service, these telephone companies would have an unfair advantage, because their cable transmissions could be subsidized by the profits of their monopolies on phone service.


16.   On the basis of the information provided in the passage above, which of the following questions can be answered?


(A) Are phone companies as efficient as cable companies in providing reliable and inexpensive service?


(B) If phone companies were allowed to provide cable service, would they want to do so?


(C) Do the cable companies believe that the local phone companies make a profit on phone service?


(D) Are local phone companies forbidden to offer cable service?C


(E) Is it expected that phone companies will have a monopoly on cable service?


為什么E不對??

沙发
发表于 2005-2-15 21:44:00 | 只看该作者

if the telephone companies were to offer cable service, these telephone companies would have an unfair advantage, because their cable transmissions could be subsidized by the profits of their monopolies on phone service.


这是文章的结论,可以看出的就是CABLE公司认为TELEPHONE会去提供CABLE SERVICE因为-->他们可以获得利润。


问的是上面的信息可以回答下面哪个问题,那就要牵涉到利润才可以。


(C) Do the cable companies believe that the local phone companies make a profit on phone service?


CABLE认为TELEPHONE可以获得利润否?


文章中的信息回答了,是的CABLE认为TELEPHONE会去提供CABLE因为他可以获得利润。


E,文章只是提到利润,没有提到垄断,文章涉及的垄断是EVIDENCE,不是结论。TELEPHONE在CABLE上垄断不垄断没关系,文章的结论是,只要TELEPHONE能在这CABLE SERVICE上获得利润,他们就会去做。

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2005-2-16 10:09:00 | 只看该作者

原來題目是問文中給齣的信息能囬答哪個問題,看來我是沒理解問題的意思

謝謝fiscal,我明白暸

地板
发表于 2006-9-21 10:53:00 | 只看该作者

因为刚好看到楼上的解答,觉得不好。是这样的,E问是否电话公司会垄断cable service,文章回答了这个问题unfair advantage来自于电话公司已经垄断了电话线,所以CABLE公司才担心电话公司会垄断整个CABLE市场。但是C问的是电话公司是否在电话业务上有PROFIT,这个CABLE公司不会关心。

5#
发表于 2006-9-22 01:09:00 | 只看该作者

我觉得楼上的解释也有问题,大家看这样是不是好一点:

这题的conclusion: telephone companies would have an unfair advantage if they were to offer cable service.

Evidence: cable transmissions could be subsidized by the profits of their monopolies on phone service.

这里有个assumption就是,cable companies assume that telphone companines do make profit on phone service.

This is just what C states. Exactly match!

共同探讨 

6#
发表于 2008-4-17 23:24:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用eleine在2006-9-22 1:09:00的发言:

我觉得楼上的解释也有问题,大家看这样是不是好一点:

这题的conclusion: telephone companies would have an unfair advantage if they were to offer cable service.

Evidence: cable transmissions could be subsidized by the profits of their monopolies on phone service.

这里有个assumption就是,cable companies assume that telphone companines do make profit on phone service.

This is just what C states. Exactly match!

共同探讨 

Great explanation.

Actually, it is an evaluation question. If the anwser is Yes, the conclusion in question is valid. Otherwise, it's false.

7#
发表于 2008-5-29 16:13:00 | 只看该作者

cable transmissions could be subsidized by the profits of their monopolies on phone service

哪位可以帮助翻译下这句到底什么意思

8#
发表于 2008-5-30 17:19:00 | 只看该作者
(phone companies )可以通过用他们从phone service获得的利润来资助 cable transmissions
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2026-3-8 09:22
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部