ChaseDream
搜索
12
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: mudfish
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD12-25-26

[复制链接]
11#
发表于 2005-6-18 06:48:00 | 只看该作者

25题还是不明白为什么d说provide a reason??


请多指教, 谢谢

12#
发表于 2005-6-18 13:28:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用clelia在2005-3-12 12:59:00的发言:

【Q25】


Yet despite the considerable overlap


between Wegener’s concepts and the


(25)     later widely embraced plate tectonics


theory, and despite the fact that conti-


nental drift theory presented a possible


solution to the problem of the origin of


mountains at a time when existing expla-


(30)     nations were seriously in doubt, in its


day Wegener’s theory was rejected


by the vast majority of geologists.


We can tell from the above statement that the continental drift theory might be a good theory, but it was not convinced people. In short, it is suprising that this theory was not accepted by geologist in his time.


同意上述对25题的解释。


虽然,尽管......,瓦格纳的理论当时不被接受。这里“尽管”后面的内容,就是对现象的奇怪的原因说明。


provide a reason why it might seem surprising that continental drift theory was not more widely embraced by geologists



[此贴子已经被作者于2005-6-18 13:33:10编辑过]
13#
发表于 2006-6-14 16:32:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用jones79在2005-5-3 19:58:00的发言:
Wegener的板块漂移理论是对的,并且被后人所支持,但是理论证明的论据不充分,数据过于简单,测量工具过于简陋,所以在当时不值得信服

说的好,让我茅塞顿开.终于明白了,in contrast后面说的起什么作用了!!

14#
发表于 2007-1-11 17:11:00 | 只看该作者
up
15#
发表于 2007-11-13 17:01:00 | 只看该作者

25T大家不觉得surprising用得很夸张吗?作者的行文没有流露surprising的意味吧。

16#
发表于 2009-8-4 22:46:00 | 只看该作者
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-19 18:27
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部