以下金融管理类硕士你选哪个？

cheesechan

zwwbill 发表于 2014-12-5 21:20
为什么呢？LSE的MSF就2门core和4门elective感觉学不到太多，另外就是career service这块，毕竟不是商学院 ...

LBS/LSE definitly

who care about the program structure?...........well, not mean that have no value, but the brand name is the ultmost important, and IC is after LSE in general finance job for sure.

cheesechan

嘈嘈水声 发表于 2014-12-5 21:27
这个finance school不是说课程设置，而是学校整体的风格，以及学生将来的就业去向，基本都在金融圈。我觉 ...

LBS is definitly a finance school, but i guess for LSE too (not the career serivce, but the enviornment and network)

the only concern of LBS MiM is.......the content.

having a master in management means that one may not be technical enough for junior financial analyst/modeling role. not sure about OP's career goal, but this is a potential problem.

嘈嘈水声

cheesechan 发表于 2014-12-5 21:42
LBS is definitly a finance school, but i guess for LSE too (not the career serivce, but the envior ...

课程设置是这样的。但是我觉得对于这种一年master来说，学校要更胜于课程的，毕竟一年的课程再怎么tough也不会让你多么technical。LBS的就业很好，LSE相对就差点。如果是香港的话，LBS优势就更大了

cheesechan

嘈嘈水声 发表于 2014-12-5 21:58
课程设置是这样的。但是我觉得对于这种一年master来说，学校要更胜于课程的，毕竟一年的课程再怎么tough ...

i agree that LBS > LSE in general as a business school, but not too much as LSE does place tons of student into the industry.

but as a fresh graduate, both school are enough for getting the CV to the interview.
and for junior position, what one knows (fit the job requirement) will be sounds more important than the reputation / network to me. At the end, company will look for one who can really do something (rather than go networking and find new business, which are more a management level duty) at junior level.
I personally dont buy the idea of MSF, but if one is applying for a financial modeling position, MSF is definitly better than a MiM, which is a softer degree, unless one is already well-prepared in finance.
[as long as the school is enough to bring one to the interview, the name of the school is no longer really important - interview is the key afterwards]

in conclusion, i will say.....that's not a easy decision, and greatly depends on the career goal and personal profile, i.e. fit.


P.S. In school selection, the most important concern should not be the output indeed, but the value created for the applicant. for example: Y = beta * X, Y = career after graduation, beta = the school provide, X = quality before coming in.
simply looking into the Y to do decision is indeed means that we place a strong assumption on all input are close enough. what is important should be the beta, the effect of education on one.
of course it is impossible to quantify it (not to mention it is different for different people, so-called fit or not), but we can have a feeling from it from the networking, career service, industrial reputation, program structure, size of intake and etc.... (different displine have different weighting on different cirteria.......e.g. MFE will place much more emphasis on the research faculty and program structure, while for MiM is on the other side)

zwwbill

嘈嘈水声 发表于 2014-12-5 21:58
课程设置是这样的。但是我觉得对于这种一年master来说，学校要更胜于课程的，毕竟一年的课程再怎么tough ...

谢谢你的建议

zwwbill

cheesechan 发表于 2014-12-5 22:36
i agree that LBS > LSE in general as a business school, but not too much as LSE does place tons of  ...

Thank you for your suggestion!

lsyzcctreesun

楼主大神为什么没申MIT呢~？

zwwbill

lsyzcctreesun 发表于 2014-12-5 22:55
楼主大神为什么没申MIT呢~？

申请了，没写上去，因为如果MIT给offer我觉得我会毫不犹豫去的。只是剩下这些想讨论一下而已。

yyc8587

zwwbill 发表于 2014-12-5 21:20
为什么呢？LSE的MSF就2门core和4门elective感觉学不到太多，另外就是career service这块，毕竟不是商学院 ...

LSE的金融堪比MIT的，在金融领域绝对强于LBS的MiM，个人观点

zwwbill

yyc8587 发表于 2014-12-6 00:16
LSE的金融堪比MIT的，在金融领域绝对强于LBS的MiM，个人观点

我觉得有夸大之嫌，还是不能和MIT比的，都不在一个tier上，我觉得要低一个level。