stefanie 作文帖 写写写！

Stefan00

As a modern civilization, today's society counts a lot on knowledge. Some people might say that mankind has undergone no general improvement in intelligence or morality. But we have to admit that it has made a great progress of the accumulation of knowledge which is the main dynamic of the development of human beings. All those should thank to education and professors in universities who devote their whole life to teaching and doing researches.

It's a huge mistake to underestimate the importance of professors. And the underestimation in its turn deteriorates the quality of education.  One of the evidences is that professors can't get the as equal salary as their contributions.  Therefore, in order to provide a better education to generations, universities should spend more money on the salaries for universities professors.

In a variety of engineering and technology subjects, instead of wholeheartedly focusing on offering better lectures to students, professors might use a portion of their time and energy to do some "part-time"jobs such as opening high-technology companies, developing some cutting-edge devices for companies which pay them decent rewards, and things like that. It's understandable in such a high-cost-for-living  society. Professors have to pay their children's education bills, the house bills, the car bills, and their daily expenditure. Thus, if we want a high quality of education, what we should do is to pay reasonable salaries to professors rather than blame them.

Besides, high salaries would definitely attract large number of well-educated talents to apply for the professor positions. Good reputation, decent salary, easy and simple ambience, and academic vacations---- how could people not want a job like that? Fierce competence brings out the best winners to the education commission, of course, improving the quality of education. What's more, good salaries make sure that professors can fully devote their energy and time to understand their students, have inspiring discussions with counterparts and students, seize the core of education, then perform perfectly the education procedure.  

Moreover, high salaries paid by universities are good for universities to build their prestige, and therefore enhance their education system and foundation. Because by paying enough money, universities show their honesty, care, and respect to knowledge and truth, which are the original goals to build a university and what will truly touch those scholars who really care about the good of knowledge and education. Once truth and knowledge come to the university, the quality of education will undoubtedly improve.

In conclusion, for the sake of education, professors in universities should be paid more than they are now.

Stefan00

integrated writing
The reading passage explores the issue that whether the  communal online encyclopedias are better than the traditional printed encyclopedias. The professor deals with the same issue. She thinks that the statement in the reading passage is full of prejudice and biases and online encyclopedias are better than the tradition one. She gives three reasons to support her idea.

First, even though the reading passage states that authors of those online encyclopedias lack academic training and are not so reliable as those authors of traditional encyclopedias. Therefore, online encyclopedias contains much more errors. But the professor in the lecture argues that mistakes exist both on and off the Internet. Even if those authors of traditional printed encyclopedias have been trained for academic credentials, they still make mistakes in the books. Obviously, the professor's argument disprove its' counterpart in the passage.

Moreover, contrary to the statement in the reading passage that the nature of online encyclopedias allows some unscrupulous users and vandals or hackers to forge, change the original information in the encyclopedias, which damages the credit of encyclopedias, the professor contends that the information actually won't be marred. She supports this point by the fact that there are editors working to make sure that the crucial information won't be changed and there are some formation written for the crucial information so that the security of the truth in the encyclopedias is assured.

Finally, the professor asserts that the online encyclopedias can show the great diversity of various groups' needs which are one of the strongest advantages of the online encyclopedias, whereas the reading passage claims that the online encyclopedias will make a false impression of what is important and what is not.  The professor proves her point by pointing out that traditional printed encyclopedias in fact are edited by a small group which consists of mainly scholar, thus it can not reflect the diversity of needs of the whole society.

In conclusion, the professor clearly identifies the weaknesses in the reading passage and convincingly shows that the claim in the reading passage that the traditional printed encyclopedias are better than the online encyclopedias is incorrect.

Stefan00

The reading passage explores the issue that whether the  communal online encyclopedias are better than the traditional printed encyclopedias. The professor deals with the same issue. She thinks that the statement in the reading passage is full of prejudice and biases and online encyclopedias are better than the tradition one. She gives three reasons to support her idea.

First, even though the reading passage states that authors of those online encyclopedias lack academic training and are not so reliable as those authors of traditional encyclopedias. Therefore, online encyclopedias contains much more errors. But the professor in the lecture argues that mistakes exist both on and off the Internet. Even if those authors of traditional printed encyclopedias have been trained for academic credentials, they still make mistakes in the books. Obviously, the professor's argument disprove its' counterpart in the passage.

Moreover, contrary to the statement in the reading passage that the nature of online encyclopedias allows some unscrupulous users and vandals or hackers to forge, change the original information in the encyclopedias, which damages the credit of encyclopedias, the professor contends that the information actually won't be marred. She supports this point by the fact that there are editors working to make sure that the crucial information won't be changed and there are some formation written for the crucial information so that the security of the truth in the encyclopedias is assured.

Finally, the professor asserts that the online encyclopedias can show the great diversity of various groups' needs which are one of the strongest advantages of the online encyclopedias, whereas the reading passage claims that the online encyclopedias will make a false impression of what is important and what is not.  The professor proves her point by pointing out that traditional printed encyclopedias in fact are edited by a small group which consists of mainly scholar, thus it can not reflect the diversity of needs of the whole society.

In conclusion, the professor clearly identifies the weaknesses in the reading passage and convincingly shows that the claim in the reading passage that the traditional printed encyclopedias are better than the online encyclopedias is incorrect.

hellotoeve

你分手了吗？