求助0G-12题 头盔问题

CRX1230

12. Which of the following most logically completes the passage?
Most bicycle helmets provide good protection for the top and back of the head, but little or no protection for the temple regions on the sides of the head. A study of head injuries resulting from bicycle accidents showed that a large proportion were caused by blows to the temple area. Therefore, if bicycle helmets protected this area, the risk of serious head injury in bicycle accidents would be greatly reduced, especially since _______

(A) among the bicyclists included in the study’s sample of head injuries, only a very small proportion had been wearing a helmet at the time of their accident

(D) the bone in the temple area is relatively thin and impacts in that area are thus very likely to cause brain injury

前提一 现有的摩托头盔保护头顶和后部 不保护太阳穴
前提二 一项研究表明交通意外受伤有很大几率是因为太阳穴受伤
conclusion： 如果头盔保护了太阳穴，那么事故中受伤的几率就会明显降低
问加强。

A说研究中大部分不带头盔，那么就是大部分T受伤的没带头盔。
不戴头盔的时候，T易受伤，  所以conclusion： 如果头盔保护了太阳穴，那么事故中受伤的几率就会明显降低
这个逻辑哪里错了？

三塘木

这道题用helr的方式来回答：
先找结论和前提：
结论：Therefore, if bicycle helmets protected this area, the risk of serious head injury in bicycle accidents would be greatly reduced,
前提：Most bicycle helmets provide good protection for the top and back of the head, but little or no protection for the temple regions on the sides of the head
A study of head injuries resulting from bicycle accidents showed that a large proportion were caused by blows to the temple area.

２判断推理模式：前提里面陈述了两个不相关的事实现象（时间先后上是同时发生的），然后结论里把这两个现象联系在了一起，做出了头盔和受伤上是正相关关系的结论。 这是很明显的相关因果类的题目。相关因果类的ＣＱ有因果不相关，第三因素，中间因素和因果方向问题。

３。D 选项加强了头盔改进和受伤减少上的关系，强调了两者的因果，所以被考虑为正确选项。而Ａ的话不能证明这个因果结论关系，反而是另外一种现象观察，和本题中的现象观察性质是一样的。因为头部受伤的人中戴头盔的少，所以说受不受伤和戴不戴头盔就有绝对关系吗？那带报纸呢？带孩子呢？这个没办法自证，这个最多只是观察到的现象。