Q7
It can be inferred from the passage that both Tulving and Clayton would agree with which of the following statements?
A.Animals’ abilities to use information about a specific past event are not conclusive evidence of episodic memory.
B.Animals do not share humans’ abilities to reexperience the past through memory.
C.The accuracy of animals’ memories is difficult to determine through direct experimentation.
D.Humans tend to recollect single bits of information more accurately than do animals.
E.The binding of different kinds of information is not a distinctive feature of episodic memory。
我对B有疑问。请看文章中的说法:
Such experiments cannot, however, reveal whether the birds were reexperiencing the past when retrieving the information. Clayton acknowledged this by using the term “episodic-like” memory. 第一位同志固然不同意动物有重新经历过去的能力,因为他认为这个能力是人类uniquely的;第二位同志,根据上面的语句,也认识到动物没有这样的能力。那么B错在哪里?
反而答案A,我觉得有点小错误。因为这个试验,第一个人从始至终没有参与过或者表过态,他对这些证据是否能够得出某个结论好像应该没有什么评价吧?
NN们请指正!! |