大家看看这个帖子: http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=24&ID=72121 GWD 5-15 我选的是B,但答案不一,有选A的,有选C的 Q15: Lightbox, Inc., owns almost all of the movie theaters in Washington County and has announced plans to double the number of movie screens it has in the county within five years. Yet attendance at Lightbox’s theaters is only just large enough for profitability now and the county’s population is not expected to increase over the next ten years. Clearly, therefore, if there is indeed no increase in population, Lightbox’s new screens are unlikely to prove profitable. Which of the following, if true about Washington County, most seriously weakens the argument?
- Though little change in the size of the population is expected, a pronounced shift toward a younger, more affluent, and more entertainment-oriented population is expected to occur.
- The sales of snacks and drinks in its movie theaters account for more of Lightbox’s profits than ticket sales do.
- In selecting the mix of movies shown at its theaters, Lightbox’s policy is to avoid those that appeal to only a small segment of the movie going population.
- Spending on video purchases, as well as spending on video rentals, is currently no longer increasing.
- There are no population centers in the county that are not already served by at least one of the movie theaters that Lightbox owns and operates.
The key is A, I chose C. C is also logic, since the company can also increase the population who come to see the cinema.Please give me some tips. Thank you! 我同意这个人说的:A中所谓的a younger, more affluent, and more entertainment-oriented population 并不能直接转换为会多看电影的population . 和这个人说的 尽管A与C能增加看电影的人数, 但看电影的人数增加就一定能增加利润吗? 例如, 每卖一张电影票就亏5美分, 卖的越多亏的越多. 如果利润主要是电影票以外的因素产生的,例如食品; 人数的增加促进了食品的销售从而提高了利润, 就如B所说的, 能够起到削弱作用.... 所以我选B.不过我知道自己的逻辑很差,总是想偏了,mm们都选什么? |