ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1531|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[逻辑小分队] 狒狒上的一道题

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2014-8-9 23:03:54 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
45. Commissioner:Budget forecasters project a revenue shortfall of a billion dollars in thecoming fiscal year. Since there is no feasible way to increase the availablefunds, our only choice is to decrease expenditures. The plan before yououtlines feasible cuts that would yield savings of a billion dollars over thecoming fiscal year. We will be able to solve the problem we face, therefore,only if we adopt this plan.
This reasoning inthe commissioner’s argument is flawed because this argument
(A) relies oninformation that is far from certain
(B) confuses beingan adequate solution with being a required solution
(C)inappropriately relies on the opinions of experts
(D)inappropriately employs language that is vague
(E) takes forgranted that there is no way to increase available funds
答案选择B,是说这个plan是必要条件不是充要条件,对充分必要有点不明白,,,麻烦NN解释一下~~

收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2014-8-10 17:07:45 | 只看该作者
拙见:
题干说提供了一个减少开支的办法,同时结论是“only if”执行这个办法,这样就没有给其他方法机会。如果有另外一个办法也可以减少开支,“only if”就用的不合适了。B点出了这个漏洞。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2014-8-10 21:28:47 | 只看该作者
leo688 发表于 2014-8-10 17:07
拙见:
题干说提供了一个减少开支的办法,同时结论是“only if”执行这个办法,这样就没有给其他方法机会。 ...

原来是这样子~~我一直没注意only if ~~谢谢你啦
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-5 22:08
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部