- UID
- 833491
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2012-11-25
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
A significant number of complex repair jobs carried out by Ace Repairs have to be reworked under the company’s warranty. The reworked jobs are invariably satisfactory. When initial repairs are inadequate, therefore, it is not because the mechanics lack competence; rather, there is clearly a level of focused concentration that complex repairs require that is elicited more reliably by rework jobs than by first-time jobs.
The argument above assumes which of the following?
A. There is no systematic difference in membership between the group of mechanics who do first-time jobs and the group of those who do rework jobs. 划线部分第一部分:现象X并不是因为A
划线部分第二部分:现象X其实是因为B
这里A和B是两个彼此不想关的原因。在文中否定A的情况下,想要证明B成立,需要证明在B的情况下,A这个变量要控制一致。
说人话,就是:第一次工作做不好,并非技工能力不够。第二次才能修好,是因为第二次工作相较之下更专注。如果两次用的技工不是同一个人,那么就不能排除是否”machanics lack competence“这个因素导致了文中的问题,也就不能进一步得出conclusion。
B. There is no company that successfully competes with Ace Repairs for complex repair jobs.
C. Ace Repairs’ warranty is good on first-time jobs but does not cover rework jobs.
D. Ace Repairs does not in any way penalize mechanics who have worked on complex repair jobs that later had to be reworked.
E. There is no category of repair jobs in which Ace Repairs invariably carries out first-time jobs satisfactorily
|
|