- UID
- 779686
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2012-7-11
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
沙发

楼主 |
发表于 2014-7-29 22:31:22
|
只看该作者
Part II: Speed 'Hot Jupiter' measurements throw water on theory
Dry atmospheres of three exoplanets challenge ideas of how planets form.
BY Mark Zastrow | 24 July, 2014
[Time 2]
Scientists searching for worlds outside of the Solar System say that three such planets — distant gas giants that resemble Jupiter — are surprisingly dry.
The atmospheres of these exoplanets, known as ‘hot Jupiters’, contain between one-tenth and one-thousandth water vapour than predicted, measurements from the Hubble Space Telescope show. The findings, published 24 July in Astrophysical Journal Letters1, are at odds with theories of how planets form.
The study re-analyses observations of the exoplanets HD 189733b, HD 209458b and WASP-12b, which are 20–270 parsecs (60–870 light years) away from Earth. As each exoplanet crossed in front of its host star, Hubble observed the spectrum of infrared light filtering through the planet’s atmosphere. A team led by Nikku Madhusudhan, an astronomer at the University of Cambridge, UK, then used atmospheric models to determine the combination of elements that produced each planet’s spectrum.
The results suggest that the environments of all three hot Jupiters are drier than Jupiter itself. HD 209458b, which yielded the most precise measurements, seems to be the driest — its atmosphere is 1,000 times drier than Jupiter's, and 100 times drier than the Sun's.
Under current theory, planets should accumulate molecules such as water faster than their host stars, write the authors. Hot Jupiters typically form in water-rich areas of solar systems and migrate toward their host stars. But Madhusudhan says the new findings suggest that these theories may have to be revised.
[235 words]
[Time 3]
However, some scientists favour another possible explanation. Clouds at high altitudes above the exoplanets could be obscuring Hubble’s view of the water vapour buried deeper in the atmosphere. If this is true, “their results are completely undermined,” says Adam Burrows, an astronomer at Princeton University in New Jersey, who was part of the team whose data on HD 209458b were analysed in the current study2. He was not involved with the latest study.
Madhusudhan thinks that it is possible, but not likely, that clouds are skewing his results. The particles would have to be high in the atmosphere, above the water vapour, for this to be true. That would place the clouds in the thinnest part of each exoplanet's atmosphere, but they could be too heavy to stay aloft. The clouds would also need to survive in the wide range of temperatures the three planets' atmospheres span — 900–2,200 ºC — which models can't yet explain. “There is just no candidate cloud composition or physics that can do it,” he says.
But the fact that is is unclear how such clouds could be made doesn’t mean they don’t exist, says Zachory Berta-Thompson, an astronomer at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge. He and his colleagues have studied a hot rocky planet named GJ 1214b and determined that clouds were present high in its atmosphere, in a layer even thinner than those that Madhusudhan are considering3. “It’s a little bit frustrating that these planets are slightly more complicated than we’d like them to be,” Berta-Thompson says.
Researchers hope that telescopes now in development, including NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope and some large ground-based facilities under construction, will provide higher-resolution data that can dispel some of the current confusion.
[287 words]
Source: nature
http://www.nature.com/news/hot-jupiter-measurements-throw-water-on-theory-1.15618
Dinosaur-killing asteroid hit at just the wrong time
Animals might have survived if impact happened a few million years earlier or later.
BY Alexandra Witze | 28 July, 2014
[Time 4]
Just before a large asteroid slammed into the Earth 66 million years ago, the diversity of plant-eating dinosaur species declined slightly, a new study suggests. That minor shift may have been enough to doom all dinosaurs when the space rock hit.
The scarcity of plant-eaters would have left them more vulnerable to starvation and population collapse after the impact, with consequences that rippled all the way up the food chain.
“The asteroid hit at a particularly bad time,” says Stephen Brusatte, a palaeontologist at the University of Edinburgh, UK. “If it had hit a few million years earlier or later, dinosaurs probably would have been much better equipped to survive.”
Brusatte and his colleagues describe this nuanced view of the famous extinction in Biological Reviews.
Palaeontologists have argued for decades about whether dinosaurs were doing well when the asteroid hit, or whether they were experiencing a worldwide drop in the number of species. To explore this question, the study pulled information from a database on global dinosaur diversity, including hundreds of fossils found in the past decade.
Localized decline
The scientists used analytical methods to account for the fact that some fossil-bearing rock formations are well-studied and others are not, which could distort the apparent number and distribution of dinosaur species. They found most dinosaurs thriving right up until the impact. “If we look at the global picture, we don't see evidence for a long-term decline,” says team member Richard Butler, a palaeontologist at the University of Birmingham, UK. “In no sense were dinosaurs doomed to extinction and the asteroid just kind of finished them off.”
But in North America, in the last 8 to 10 million years before the asteroid hit, two major groups of herbivores — duck-billed dinosaurs and the group of horned dinosaurs that included Triceratops — did decline slightly. In some places multiple species shrank to just one species. That may be because cooler climates changed the types of vegetation available to eat, says Michael Benton, a palaeontologist at the University of Bristol, UK. Plenty of dinosaur groups had recovered from such small population drops before, but not this time.
A 2012 study that modelled ancient food webs may help to explain why, says Butler. Computer simulations suggested that just a small change in dinosaur diversity made ecosystems much more likely to collapse after big environmental perturbations — such as widespread climate change brought on by an asteroid impact. Plants would have withered up; plant-eating dinosaurs would have starved; and meat-eating dinosaurs would have had little to prey on.
[421 words]
[Time 5]
What if?
The latest study rounds up many of the discoveries of recent years, says David Archibald, a palaeontologist at San Diego State University in California. “From my reckoning much of it is pretty much spot on,” he says. “It is almost certainly the impact that kills off the dinosaurs.” But he disagrees with some of the data. In a review in press with the Geological Society of America, Archibald compares several rock formations from near the end of the time of dinosaurs, in Canada and the United States. He finds that the two-legged, primarily meat-eating dinosaurs known as theropods were also declining.
Brusatte says that the differences boil down to how researchers account for how well-studied or well-preserved various fossil-bearing rocks are. “It’s really only now with all these new dinosaur discoveries that people are able to even think about the nuances in any kind of detail,” he says.
The extinction set the stage for the modern world, Butler notes. Although one lineage of dinosaurs survived as modern birds, mammals began their rise only after the dinosaurs were out of the picture. ”That may never have happened if dinosaurs had never gone extinct,” says Butler. ”It think it's very likely that if the asteroid hadn't hit, we would still have dinosaurs around today.”
[214 words]
Source: nature
http://www.nature.com/news/dinosaur-killing-asteroid-hit-at-just-the-wrong-time-1.15616
Wonders of the northern lights
Photographer captures aurora's glow above Iceland’s Kirkjufell Mountain
BY THOMAS SUMNER| 25 July, 2014
[Time 6]
Tens of kilometers above the icy waterfalls surrounding Iceland’s Kirkjufell Mountain, Earth’s magnetic field drags electrons from the sun to their visually stunning demise. The zooming particles collide with nitrogen and oxygen in the upper atmosphere, an interaction that produces a brilliant blue-green light show called an aurora.
Photographer Nicholas Roemmelt captured this scene on a moonlit night in March. The shot won him third prize in the “Beauty of the Night Sky” category of the recent International Earth & Sky Photo Contest.
While scientists know the basics of how auroras form, many aspects of the lights elude explanation. On March 3, NASA launched a rocket into the heart of an aurora shining above Venetie, Alaska, to measure the particles and electric fields at work. By combining the rocket’s data from its 10-minute flight with observations from the ground, researchers received an unprecedented look inside the northern lights. NASA hopes the mission will illuminate mysteries such as the origin of auroral curls, which look like cream swirling in a cup of coffee.
[172 words]
Source: sciencenews
https://www.sciencenews.org/article/wonders-northern-lights
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册
x
|