ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 874|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

LSAT-9-23

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-1-28 18:42:00 | 只看该作者

LSAT-9-23

23.   Mayor Smith, one of our few government officials with a record of outspoken, informed, and consistent opposition to nuclear power plant construction projects, has now declared herself in favor of building the nuclear power plant at Littletown. If someone with her past antinuclear record now favors building this power plant, then there is good reason to believe that it will be safe and therefore should be built.


The argument is vulnerable to criticism on which one of the following grounds?


(A) It overlooks the possibility that not all those who fail to speak out on issues of nuclear power are necessarily opposed to it.


(B) It assumes without warrant that the qualities enabling a person to be elected to public office confer on that person a grasp of the scientific principles on which technical decisions are based.


(C) It fails to establish that a consistent and outspoken opposition is necessarily an informed opposition.


(D) It leads to the further but unacceptable conclusion that any project favored by Mayor Smith should be sanctioned simply on the basis of her having spoken out in favor of it.E


(E) It gives no indication of either the basis of Mayor Smith’s former opposition to nuclear power plant construction or the reasons for her support for the Littletown project.



DEAR FRIENDS:help me!i don't know how to do this t.HTANX

沙发
发表于 2005-1-29 11:43:00 | 只看该作者
E的意思为原文并没说市长以前为何反对,现在为何支持。正好描述了原文的推理缺陷。故为答案
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 法学院申请

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-9 20:16
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部