ving的三种用法 OG25:
Neuroscientists, having amassed awealth of knowledge over the past twenty years about the brain and itsdevelopment from birth to adulthood, are now drawing solid conclusions about howthe human brain grows and how babies acquire language.
(A) Neuroscientists, having amassed awealth of knowledge over the past twenty years about the brain and itsdevelopment from birth to adulthood, are
(B) Neuroscientists, having amassed awealth of knowledge about the brain and its development from birth to adulthoodover the past twenty years, and are
(C) Neuroscientists amassing a wealth ofknowledge about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood over thepast twenty years, and are
(D) Neuroscientists have amassed awealth of knowledge over the past twenty years about the brain and itsdevelopment from birth to adulthood,
(E) Neuroscientists have amassed, overthe past twenty years, a wealth of knowledge about the brain and itsdevelopment from birth to adulthood,
句子结构变为原因做主句,结果做从句:Neuroscientists have amassed, now drawing solid… 主句是完成时,从句做伴随,不能伴随一个状态(完成时是一个状态),伴随应该是一个动作的结果。 首先不是同时发生的,另外不是unavoidable结果【伴随】
也就是说现在分词所能表现的三种功能在D选项中都不适用。 1.伴随状语,伴随主句动作,have amassed, 说明神经学家已经收集了一堆资料的同时,得出了某个结论。当被修饰主句已经是完成时态,那么后面的现在分词本身就不可能再与主句动作发生在同一时刻,所以无法以 “伴随动作”的身份出现,只可能行使“伴随结果”的功能。 2.结果状语,隐蔽的错误,这个不是immediate 结果,也就是说收集了资料不一定必然导致得出结论,所以不行。 3.后置定语,修饰adulthood,逻辑意思不符合,所以不行。(类似于A中的having的用法)
同时ing在末尾,优先作为状语,行不通的情况下就会产生3的用法,貌似在修饰adulthood
相关题目:
曼哈顿:ving: 1)修饰就近名词,og48,prep下200(p185)。 2)修饰主语及谓语动词 66-c, 3)修饰逗号前的整个句子,作为结果伴随(ving不需要修饰到主语的,什么leading就是最好的例子) OG:55, Ving开头修饰不touch:62、65,69-未划线 Ving前没有逗号,修饰touch的名词65-c,7-a SVO,VING: 66-c ,67-B , Comma+including:including作为介词,而不是伴随,修饰comma之前的词:67
谓语为B动词的comma+ving:
OG-29-A, The letters were written...,outnumbering....伴随错。伴随两种,1)同时发生? No; 2)动作的直接结果?No,主语是Be动词,是描述一个状态,而不是一个动作。
og-48题,也是A be a lake,covering...句型是正确选项,并不是伴随,而是修饰名词lake:xxx is the largest lake on earth,covering...
og-79-a,Akutagawa’s knowledge was instrumental…, informing both…and… be动词作为谓语动词,也可以伴随主谓啊~~ inform的主语应该是Akutagawa’s knowledge
这个informing回答了前句 how to be instrumental的问题。
og-35-b/c
|