ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3023|回复: 10
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]about平行,beV不同究竟可不可省?

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-1-19 16:40:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]about平行,beV不同究竟可不可省?


我有兩個關於平行的問題:


1. 本來我的觀念在平行結構下是不可省的, 但在看OG討論貼時發現好像可以耶


原句為: I am a student, and he is a teacher.


可省為: I am a student and he a teacher.


害我整個人傻眼...


還是說我哪裡會錯意了? 請幫我釐清一下

2. 不知在哪學到的觀念, 我記得平行表達主被動不可以不一致, 時態才可以, 但我在OG中發現不少平行中主被動不一致的情況耶…我是不是哪裡觀念又錯了?

沙发
发表于 2005-1-19 16:52:00 | 只看该作者

我觉得平行还是关键要看逻辑意思,如果你省略的东西会引起逻辑上的不清楚或者歧义,只是为了平行,那也不可以吧。

I am a student, and he is a teacher。我是造句说明and前面要有逗号的。呵呵,至于你省略出来的句子是否正确,要查查字典啦。不过我记得好像看到前面有人这么说,可以的。

我好像没有在哪里学到主动和被动一定不能同时用。随便举例:I studied GMAT in office and was caught by my manager. 你觉得这个句子错吗?

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2005-1-19 17:17:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用cicilla在2005-1-19 16:52:00的发言:

我觉得平行还是关键要看逻辑意思,如果你省略的东西会引起逻辑上的不清楚或者歧义,只是为了平行,那也不可以吧。


I am a student, and he is a teacher。我是造句说明and前面要有逗号的。呵呵,至于你省略出来的句子是否正确,要查查字典啦。不过我记得好像看到前面有人这么说,可以的。我是看og218 http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=23&ID=68954的, 因為第一次接觸到這種新觀念, 所以印象很深刻, 在做gwd時也格外小心,http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardID=23&ID=61200&page=1中, 就因為這新觀念把我搞慘了...有人說可以省, 有人說不行, 搞得我有點歇斯底裡了


我好像没有在哪里学到主动和被动一定不能同时用。随便举例:I studied GMAT in office and was caught by my manager. 你觉得这个句子错吗?

所以說不管如何 主被動不一致也是可以平行的囉? 吼~~~好想K人, 是哪個老師給我的觀念啊...氣!


地板
发表于 2005-1-20 01:55:00 | 只看该作者

I am a student, and he is a teacher.    -- perfectly ok


I am a student and he a teacher.    -- I have doubts.


        1) the comma before "and" is omitted.


        2) he (is) a teacher.   


Anyway, that's an exceptional example.


In conclusion, IF 'and' is followed by a complete sentence,


               THEN there should be a comma ahead of 'and'.


                   In this case, 'and' connects two independent complete sentences.


               ELSE 'and' connects two parts that share the same subject.


Active and passive verbs can paralell.


   e.g. He was born in 1980 and now is in college.


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-1-20 1:56:02编辑过]
5#
发表于 2005-1-20 09:46:00 | 只看该作者

~~~abstracted from online writing lab, FYI

Parallel structure means using the same pattern of words to show that two or more ideas have the same level of importance. This can happen at the word, phrase, or clause level. The usual way to join parallel structures is with the use of coordinating conjunctions such as "and" or "or."


1. Words and Phrases

With the -ing form (gerund) of words:

Parallel: Mary likes hiking, swimming, and bicycling.

With infinitive phrases:

Parallel: Mary likes to hike, to swim, and to ride a bicycle.
OR
Mary likes to hike, swim, and ride a bicycle.

(Note: You can use "to" before all the verbs in a sentence or only before the first one.)

Do not mix forms.

Example 1

Not Parallel: Mary likes hiking, swimming, and to ride a bicycle.
Parallel: Mary likes hiking, swimming, and riding a bicycle.

Example 2

Not Parallel: The production manager was asked to write his report quickly, accurately, and in a detailed manner.
Parallel: The production manager was asked to write his report quickly, accurately, and thoroughly.

Example 3

Not Parallel: The teacher said that he was a poor student because he waited until the last minute to study for the exam, completed his lab problems in a careless manner, and his motivation was low.
Parallel: The teacher said that he was a poor student because he waited until the last minute to study for the exam, completed his lab problems in a careless manner, and lacked motivation.
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-1-20 14:15:00 | 只看该作者

still confused... 請看gwd 3-10, 究竟beV能不能省我覺得很關鍵耶,如果可以,C就對了不是嗎?如果不對,CDE就可以快速刪掉了... 我做的時候選C, 就是因為在OG218中, NN給我的新觀念"平行中, 即使beV不一致, 第2個beV仍可以省略"  但此題有人說"beV不一致不可省"...害我又胡塗了。還是說這根本是不同的句子, 不能相比? 我到底是哪個觀念不正確呀? 懇請指明~  btw, 平行結構是不是N.可以和N.子句平行?  我記得在看OG的時候有發現到...想確定一下...還有什麼比較特別的平行嗎? 我只知道不能只求結構上的平行, 句意也要符合(被那題partly to...and partly because...整到了)...真是有夠難判斷!   題外話: 怎麼換行呀? 我找不到換行鍵...

Q10:

Antarctica receives more solar radiation than does any other place on Earth, yet the temperatures are so cold and the ice cap is reflective, so that little polar ice melts during the summer; otherwise, the water levels of the oceans would rise 250 feet and engulf most of the world’s great cities.


  1. is reflective, so that little polar ice melts during the summer; otherwise,
  2. is so reflective that little of the polar ice melts during the summer; were it to do so,
  3. so reflective that little polar ice melts during the summer, or else
  4. reflective, so that little of the polar ice melts during the summer, or
  5. reflects so that little of the polar ice melts during the summer; if it did
7#
发表于 2005-1-21 12:31:00 | 只看该作者
请教答案!是B吗?
8#
发表于 2005-1-21 12:54:00 | 只看该作者
这道题有很多人倾向B或C. 还没有定论. 请查一下CD.
9#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-1-22 16:05:00 | 只看该作者
哈哈..所以說只要確定到底能不能省  答案就會有定論了!
10#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-1-27 12:10:00 | 只看该作者
唉唉 沒人可以幫我解個惑嗎?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-4-26 15:42
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部