ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: delia12345
打印 上一主题 下一主题

天山-3-24(以前没讨论过)

[复制链接]
51#
发表于 2008-6-15 15:47:00 | 只看该作者
mba said the following,

強烈支持C。

rare
migratory bird 應該是指留鳥。也就是說這些鳥是不走的。不管red-winged
blackbird是不是第一個到達的候鳥﹐rare migratory
bird都已經在當地了。所以這些留鳥是可能第一個吃米的。當地人關心的是毒米會不會影響這些留鳥。所以C指明這些留鳥不吃毒米。應是正確答案。

至於其它候鳥是不是也吃毒米﹐ 這並不是residents關心的。注意理解文章。


After googling the phrase, I find in many newspapers that refer it as a specie of bird that is rare and migratory. Please find the one of the links below. So, according to this explanation, I've no doubt that choise A should be the best answer.

http://english.people.com.cn/english/200010/26/eng20001026_53643.html

Rare Migratory Birds Flock to Chinese Lake


        Large flocks of rare migratory birds from north China and Siberia have been arriving at Poyang Lake in east China's Jiangxi Province this week to spend the winter.


Sources with the state-level Poyang Lake Nature Reserve said the number of birds is increasing rapidly.


According to the sources, these birds include white cranes, grey cranes, swans and many other rare species ......

52#
发表于 2008-6-18 21:39:00 | 只看该作者

agree with LS

I also checked lots of paragraphs from google. It seems that "rare migratory birds" is a defined terminology that means "rare" & "migratory" birds.

53#
发表于 2008-8-30 11:48:00 | 只看该作者

如果rare migratory birds 包括red-winged blackbird(从题干中我们判断不出来是否包括,因为用的是certain而不是other),那么,如果选A的话,还是不能消除一些居民的CONCERN,因为 blackbird吃了毒药后数量就有可能被threaten.

当然B也不是好答案,C无关,因为native和migratory birds 正好相对.

感觉这道题出得很怪,就象天山第三套的大部分逻辑题一样

54#
发表于 2009-1-2 11:14:00 | 只看该作者

同意A对

但是我有疑问

E不好吗?

毒米不吸引小鸟们来吃

所以他们不会吃错东西

所以他们挂不了

不对么?

55#
发表于 2009-8-8 18:44:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用delia12345在2005/1/19 0:18:00的发言:

24,Each year red-winged blackbirds stop in a certain region of Midland Province on their spring and fall migrations. In the fall, they eat a significant portion of the province's sunflower crop. This year Midland farmers sought permits to set out small amounts of posioned rice during the blackbirds' spring stop in order to reduce the fall blackbird poplution. Some residents voiced concern that the rice could threaten certain species of rare migratory birds. Nevertheless, the wildlife agency approved the permits.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to justify the widlife agency's approved of the permits, given the conerns voiced by some residents?

A .In the region where the red-winged blackbirds stop, they are the first birds to be present in the spring.

B The poison that farmers want to use does not koll birds  but rather makes them incapable of producing viable eggs.

C. Since rice is not raised in Midland Province, few species of birds native to the province normally eat rice.

D .Without the permit, any farmers shown to have set out poison for the blackbirds would be heavily fined.

E. The posion that farmers got approval to use has no tast or smell that would make it detectable by birds.

ans:A

mine:C

请帮忙解释一下,我觉得C更有道理,文章给出的rare migratory birds.,这样的话,他们是最先出现在春天的不能保证它们一定在其他出现之前已经全部把poison吃完了。

c说birds not raised in Midland Province 也就是rare migratory birds,不吃rice,不是很对么?

原文说要保护的(即不受影响)的是rare migratory birds,不是native birds. Thus whether native birds will eat rice is irrelevant.

the answer is A.

56#
发表于 2009-8-19 22:45:00 | 只看该作者
在A与B之间痛苦抉择了半天,根据题目说的given the concern voiced by some residents,意思是也该考虑一些居民的感受,而这些居民认为毒米会对稀有鸟类构成威胁,A中说候鸟是春天第一批来的鸟,所以毒米会被他们吃掉从而不会对稀有鸟类构成威胁,所以the wildlife agency approved the permits.而B考虑的是farmer的感受,而不是居民的感受,所以还得先看清题意才是最重要的!妈妈呀,真要命。。。
57#
发表于 2009-9-7 01:54:00 | 只看该作者
a significant portion和small,对rw作为首轮消费者能吃光毒米起了大作用。
CR没一句废话。
58#
发表于 2010-1-20 19:56:40 | 只看该作者

这套题目的逻辑好难
59#
发表于 2010-9-4 08:39:35 | 只看该作者
请问大家E为什么不对呢?
60#
发表于 2010-9-26 22:56:11 | 只看该作者
其他论坛的解释
A strengthener with a twist: we have to take an objection into account.

Our prediction: an answer that suggests that the rare species will NOT be harmed by the poison.

Only (a) gives us any reason to believe that the poison will keep the blackbirds under control but won't hurt other species. If the blackbirds get there first, then we postulate that either:

- the blackbirds eat all the poisoned rice, so other birds aren't affected; or

- once the blackbirds are gone, the farmers can remove the poisoned rice, so other birds aren't affected.

Remember: "strengthen" is NOT synonomous with "prove". (a) certainly doesn't prove that other birds won't be affected, but it gives us a reason to believe that they won't be.

(b) through (e) don't distinguish between blackbirds and other birds, so they're all outside the scope.
_________________
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-9 09:48
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部