请问 逻辑10套-第4套-第7题

fairypp

逻辑10套-第4套-第7题

In Bassaria a group of that country's most senior judges has criticized the uniform mandatory sentences recently introduced for certain specific crimes.  The judges argue that such sentences, by depriving them of all discretion in setting sentences, make it impossible for them to consider either aggravating or extenuating circumstances and so make it  impossible to achieve true justice---the fitting of the severity of the punishment to the gravity of the particular crime.

Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest evidence for the claim that in Bassaria the newly introduced mandatory sentences are not necessarily a change for the worse with respect to achieving true justice as defined in the argument?

A    Before mandatory sentencing, judges in eastern Bassaria imposed strikingly different sentences from those in western Bassaria for equally grave instances of the  same kind of offense.  * ]3 ^" }* S+ x3 N. |& `! C6 z
B     In Bassaria the frequency of crimes that have been made subject to mandatory sentences is lower now than it was just prior to the introduction of mandatory sentencing.  1 m/ ]: [$ V( w/ F0 S
C    The law introducing mandatory sentences was passed in the legislature of Bassaria by a large majority and is unlikely to be repealed in the foreseeable future.  
D    There used to be a wide difference between the minimum and the maximum sentences allowed by law in cases of crimes now subject to mandatory sentences.  
E    In Bassaria judges are appointed for life and are thus not easily influenced by political pressure groups.

多谢~ 1 u4 `, y2 d8 o) b  T, a

竹林中人

问题的意思是支持这个措施的理由：
A最好吧，是直接从原因入手。B是从效果来看的，不够直接。

fairypp

竹林中人 发表于 2014-2-22 14:43
问题的意思是支持这个措施的理由：
A最好吧，是直接从原因入手。B是从效果来看的，不够直接。 ...

多谢咯~~~~~