ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1947|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

新东方 蓝皮 PREP 女权

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2013-11-6 11:28:41 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
The professionalization of the study of history in the second half of the nineteenth century, including history's transformation from a literary genre to a scientific discipline, had important consequences not only for historians' perceptions of women but also for women as historians. The disappearance of women as objects of historical studies during this period has elements of irony to it. On the one hand, in writing about women, earlier historians had relied not on firsthand sources but rather on secondary sources; the shift to more rigorous research methods required that secondary sources be disregarded. On the other hand, the development of archival research and the critical editing of collections of documents began to reveal significant new historical evidence concerning women, yet this evidence was perceived as substantially irrelevant: historians saw political history as the general framework for historical writing. Because women were seen as belonging to the private rather than to the public sphere, the discovery of documents about them, or by them, did not, by itself, produce history acknowledging the contributions of women. In addition, genres such as biography and memoir, those forms of "particular history" that women had traditionally authored, fell into disrepute. The dividing line between "particular history" and general history was redefined in stronger terms, widening the gulf between amateur and professional practices of historical research.

3.According to the passage, the development of archival research and the critical editing of collections of documents had which of the following effects?                                
  • A Historians increasingly acknowledged women's contributions to history.
  • B Historians began to debate whether secondary sources could provide reliable information.
  • C Historians began to apply less rigorous scientific research criteria to the study of women's history.
  • D More evidence concerning women became available to historical researchers.
  • E Women began to study history as professional historians.


正确答案是D。我很困惑的是文中都说了搜集的archival和critical editing是substantially irrelevan的了,无关的证据,为什么还要选D选项的 more evidence呢?

谢谢各位G友~咚咚锵~~
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2013-11-6 11:29:50 | 只看该作者
up  up up up up up
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2026-1-24 03:33
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部