ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: 杀G给猴看
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[阅读小分队] 【NativeSpeaker每日综合训练—26系列】【26-11】经管

  [复制链接]
31#
发表于 2013-10-18 20:50:33 | 只看该作者
掌管 7        00:06:52.80        00:18:23.11
掌管 6        00:02:04.77        00:11:30.30
掌管 5        00:01:19.02        00:09:25.53
掌管 4        00:01:57.63        00:08:06.50
掌管 3        00:01:55.97        00:06:08.86
掌管 2        00:01:58.82        00:04:12.89
掌管 1        00:02:14.07        00:02:14.07

Speaker:1.why we depend so heavily on experts. (uncertainty)
         2.experiment  and why we should not count on experts so much.
         3. Three strategies: take experts on(be open ), managed decent, who is the expert.
今天看之前讲如何利用小分队的帖子,看到有说只是计时的方法,所以就尝试了。结果效果不怎么好,只是了解了文章大概。看来明天还是要回到以前的方法。
只是有些问题:
一方面,我看了文章有一些句子不懂,有一些单词不认识,最终写出来的都只是我能理解的东西。
另一方面,整个搞一遍差不多一个小时(看和写),我又不想在花时间再回去看自己不懂的单词和句子(因为现在备考SC比较紧张,实在嫌时间不够)
这样的话,岂不是永远只能学到自己已经掌握的东西(只是速度快一点)!
牛牛们,我该怎么办?(昨天写的问题,原谅我厚脸皮又把它贴出来了)
今天的SPEAKER部分选的真好。。。
32#
发表于 2013-10-18 21:57:59 | 只看该作者
掌管 6        00:08:20.63        00:22:24.97
掌管 5        00:03:53.82        00:14:04.34
掌管 4        00:02:57.23        00:10:10.51
掌管 3        00:02:16.71        00:07:13.28
掌管 2        00:02:51.19        00:04:56.56
掌管 1        00:02:05.37        00:02:05.37

哭死:刚写好的obstacle回忆点了个链接跑到别的页面回来就没了,我就不补了。。
33#
发表于 2013-10-18 22:14:14 | 只看该作者
lifeisanart 发表于 2013-10-18 20:50
掌管 7        00:06:52.80        00:18:23.11
掌管 6        00:02:04.77        00:11:30.30
掌管 5        00:01:19.02        00:09:25.53

Hey,这是我的方法,希望能给你些帮助

第一,每读完一篇完整的文章,除非理解程度超过95%,否则立即重新读一遍,并将当时无法理解的词汇和句子全部标注,这样对于单词和难句的掌握都很有帮助,

第二,重点了解文章中提到的文化,风俗,或者美国当地普遍流行的东西。我们都知道要掌握一门语言,不光是“技术”上,也就是音标,单词,语法什么的,更要了解其文化背景,做到与时俱进(小分队就是一个很好的窗口啊,哈哈)。所以我会将文章中的此类词汇标注,并查询相关背景信息。

至于时间上不够这个问题,你只能自己调配了,personally,如果阅读水平已经达到GMAT的标准,可以少花一些时间,如果还没达到,我建议是花在阅读上的时间多于做题的时间。仅供参考
34#
发表于 2013-10-18 22:20:40 | 只看该作者
谢谢楼主~

Time 2 [00:01:41]  
1.3 questions that are still exicting in economic field
2.economists learn more about the financial market
3.want to know whether polocy makers can do sth to solve these questions

Time 3[00:01:58]
economists are concerned about how to deal with these problems,howere,there are few supports from outside.Experts who keep going won the Nobel->experts need to know the financial market better

Time 4[00:01:44]
phenomenon->many scientists are unsatisfied with Noble Prize
reason->many achievement cannot be recognised at once

Time 5[00:01:12]
another reason->the same prize cannot be shared by more than three scientists,although all of their ideas and researches are similar

appeal to change the rules

Time 6[00:00:56]
introduce the three Nobel ownners' achievements and how did these results affect the finacial market

Time 7[00:05:42]
why the number of new job decreases in the start-ups

find 3 problems->over human capital(the number of immigration is declining);tax rises up;financial crisis

suggestions about how to deal with these problems
35#
发表于 2013-10-19 00:30:48 | 只看该作者
掌管 7        00:05:12.67       
掌管 6        00:01:49.36       
掌管 5        00:00:41.43       
掌管 4        00:01:06.40       
掌管 3        00:01:53.53       
掌管 2        00:02:02.81       
掌管 1        00:01:49.67
36#
发表于 2013-10-19 00:44:49 | 只看该作者
1-48  2-02 2-13 2-27 1-06 2-32
从今天起,坚持每天跟上小分队,时间紧时就泛读,时间富裕就好好措辞写一下回忆。
37#
发表于 2013-10-19 02:18:19 | 只看该作者
10.18-DAY9
【OBSTABLE】
time7 6:34
Stat-ups created fewer jobs than they supposed to be. Entrepreneurs show their worries about start-ups and related jobs situation, the worries are listed as follows:
1 It's hard to find right people for right position. Situation with immigrates is more complex that regulations limit choices of both start-ups and employees.
2 The government doesn't fulfill its promise asserted in regulations which were put up to improve the economy.  
3 Companies have problems with funding and face estra fees to start up now.
【SPEED】
time6 2:07
[warm up] 1:00
time5 2:18
time4 1:38
time3 1:59
time2 1:33
38#
发表于 2013-10-19 03:05:51 | 只看该作者
Time 2-1'39"

Nobel Prize to three economists.

economists help understand financial crisis.

three economists all have important contribution.

policy makers still don't know market.

investors don't know new financial products is good or bad.

Time 3-2'14"

economists can't predict future but should show trend of crisis.

economists work with colleagues from other fields.

(forget)

economists have no common sense about market but they all get Nobel Prize.

it's duty for economists know how market work.

Time 4-2'28"

Nobel Prize attract media attention but doesn't show how real scientific work do.

Nobel Prize committee is late in recognizing achievement, making some scientists cannot be rewarded by their achievements soon.

Time 5-2'28"

no more than three people could get one Nobel Prize at a time is critized. Many scientists publish similar ideas at similar time, but only few of them be rewarded.

the achievement is proved by big international organization with many scientists but only two scientists who predict the particles get Nobel Prize.

Warm up-1'31"

economy Nobel Prize award to three economists.

S is already the most possible candidate this year. Some scientists think F, H should not share the Prize with S although they three are hot candidate.

F's theory is countered to S's.

they three all make big contribution in understanding market.

Time 6-2'08"

F create theory show stock can't be predict. S says F's theory is ture in short time but stock price could be predict in long term.

H's innovation is used in all sorts fields.

they three make contribution to understanding market and be rewarded by Nobel Prize.

Obstacle-8'52"

start-ups provide most jobs, but number of start-ups decline.

entrepreneurs of start-ups have no time to lorrying. They complain the same problems.

start-ups cannot employ suitable employees because schools cannot provide suitable candidates.

immigrants make contribution to start-ups growth but they are forced to leave by government.

start-ups suffer high tax and policy go worse.

the assets, like house, of start-ups cannot provide enough funds for them. Ventures are also risk-averse.

should find solution to these problems.

===========

越障有点长,看了一遍记不住。
39#
发表于 2013-10-19 03:34:12 | 只看该作者
2:1‘55:287 The author started up by saying we don’t know nearly enough about why the prices of stocks, bonds and other assets move the way they do. He then listed some scientists great discoveries. In summary he said central bankers still debate whether it’s possible to recognize asset bubbles when they occur, and whether they can or should be deflated.

3:2’20:324 Economists are doing promising work, but many prestigious universities are not emphasis on these areas.  

4:2‘12:304 scientists are not happy about Noble Prize. One reason is that the committees can often be slow to recognise achievement. The author then use several samples to support his point.

5:2'34: 362 Another criticism concerns the tradition that no more than three people can share a prize. Science is rarely this clear-cut.

6:2'42:343 This article talks about how and why Noble prize is splited amount Eugene Fama, Lars Peter Hansen and Robert Shiller.

7:7'58: 952S tart-ups are the heart of the economic growth. However, the number of start-ups has decreased in recent years for generating new jobs. entrepreneurs were asked about what was wrong with the decrease in the new jobs. Reasons are human capital, immigration, complexity of government policies and raising money. Congress tried to fix some of these problems with last year’s JOBS act.
40#
发表于 2013-10-19 08:28:57 | 只看该作者
AceJ 发表于 2013-10-18 22:14
Hey,这是我的方法,希望能给你些帮助

第一,每读完一篇完整的文章,除非理解程度超过95%,否则立即重新 ...

我懂了。要发现自己的不足然后去弥补这样才能提高。
我一直太急功近利了,对阅读的正确认识和认真态度比每天只为完成任务盲目练习要重要得多。
OG"土豪“,感谢你的耐心与支持!
虽然我们做不成朋友,我会加劲在学习方法和精神上向你看齐的...
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-4-25 02:03
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部