ChaseDream
搜索
123下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 11819|回复: 29
打印 上一主题 下一主题

Why Stanford?

[精华] [复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-7-18 09:34:00 | 只看该作者

Why Stanford?

Why Stanford? 欢迎大家讨论。
沙发
发表于 2003-7-31 03:50:00 | 只看该作者
有机会的话,还是去Stanford吧。。。
Stanford Scores with the NFL  
A new executive-education program aims to boost the business acumen of pro football's coaches and execs

Stanford University's dismal football record last season -- 2-9 -- hasn't stopped the school's quest for gridiron glory. In June, the Stanford Graduate School of Business and the National Football League launched a one-week, customized program for club executives from all 32 NFL teams, one of the first such collaborations between any sports league and a university.  

The goal: To give top team executives and franchise managers -- many of them ex-players and coaches -- an extensive view of the NFL's business strategy and a healthy dose of business basics. The weeklong program brought together club executives, officials from the NFL front office, and three active players. Kicked off by an introduction from NFL Commissioner Paul Tagliabue, the eight-hour days were filled with lessons on everything from reading a balance sheet to marketing a team, to the sometimes troublesome task of talking to the media.

BIG BUSINESS.  The tone was Business 101 meets big-name glamour. The sessions were led primarily by Stanford globalization strategy and sports management professor George Foster and Hall of Fame football coach and Stanford lecturer Bill Walsh. But some other top-shelf guest lecturers also spoke. Viacom (VIA ) Chief Operating Officer Dennis Swanson weighed in on media issues, and Jeff Jordan, vice-president and general manager for U.S. business at eBay (EBAY ) gave participants an earful about the importance of listening to customers -- and fans. Martin Gold, legal counsel to Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, outlined government and legislative issues pertaining to the NFL.

Executive-education programs are something new in pro sports, where coaches and general managers tend to have shied away from going back to school for business brush-ups. But the NFL is a corporate giant that generated an estimated $4.8 billion in revenue last year, despite the weak economy. With the league's annual take expected to increase by $1 billion in the next three years (see BW Cover Story, 1/27/03, "The NFL Machine"), heightened business acumen is all the more necessary as the league faces player-trade issues, stadium financing fights, and salary-cap problems.

The NFL underwrote the program, and neither the league nor Stanford will disclose the cost of the seven-day session, though the school says it was comparable to other weeklong custom programs -- which go for as much as $10,000 per person.

BAY AREA TIES.  This mini-education effort for sports managers was born out of another of Walsh's endeavors. The former San Francisco 49ers coach, who led Stanford's football squad in earlier years, first dreamed up a coaching program for minority college coaches 20 years ago. For the past several years, Walsh has also been pushing for management seminars for sports execs. Once Tagliabue warmed to the idea, Walsh turned to Stanford to create the program.

Though Stanford isn't known for its gridiron greatness, the choice was still a no-brainer for Walsh. Both he and Gene Washington, the NFL's director of football operations, have strong ties to the Bay Area, thanks for their stints with the 49ers (Washington was a wide receiver). And both have a history with the university: Walsh was assistant football coach from 1963-65, head coach for the 1977-78 season, and he now lectures on sports management at the business school. Washington graduated from Stanford in 1969, after setting the school's all-time receiving record in 1968 of 1,117 yards.

The program isn't exactly damaging Stanford's sterling academic reputation. The prestigious business school, which is renowned for its programs in entrepreneurship and technology, raked in some $16 million in executive-education revenues for the 2000-01 school year, $2.4 million of which was for custom programs such as the NFL's. However, the school is still building its fledgling sports-management offerings, and the partnership with pro football will certainly raise the one-year-old program's profile.

ANNUAL EVENT?  In the meantime, Stanford's NFL effort is drawing kudos from participants. "It helped me to grow and understand the business," says Diane Downing, stadium operations director for the Cleveland Browns, who has a background in city government. "We each have our own responsibilities with our clubs and don't have a lot of opportunities to broaden our perspective."

The NFL and Stanford's B-school are already discussing a similar seminar for next year, and Walsh is pushing for it to become an annual event. Team managers often "don't know what's going on in the other side of the building," Walsh says. He also believes the seminars can help increase communication and understanding among business managers and the coaching staff.

After all, in pro sports, profits and losses are as important a marker of success as wins and losses.
板凳
发表于 2003-7-31 04:35:00 | 只看该作者
Stanford that name alone will open any door for you. Of course, after that, it all depends on your own capability.
地板
发表于 2003-7-31 12:54:00 | 只看该作者
?原来chipmunk是个男生啊?偶一直以为是个JJ呢。
5#
发表于 2003-8-1 02:25:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用lanlan000在2003-7-31 14:12:00的发言:

不要随便怀疑自己!

self-confidence is a must for MBA, especially for Stanford!


SUPPORT!
6#
发表于 2003-8-1 04:48:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用chipmunk在2003-7-31 4:35:00的发言:
Stanford that name alone will open any door for you. Of course, after that, it all depends on your own capability.


Any door? not in this economy and probably will not be the case for a long time. for example, a person without prior IB experience will have a tremendous difficulty to break into the industry even s/he graduates from W/Chicago/Columbia, not to mention Stanford. And unlike Wharton and HBS, Stanford doesn’t even have a strong reputation in Finance. Trust me, a name alone will not open any doors for you. Period. If you don’t believe what I said, I challenge you to ask directly a Stanford student, say, with a marketing background whether s/he could break into investment banking.

Your prior working experience counts a lot!
7#
发表于 2003-8-1 08:19:00 | 只看该作者
I believe any stanford student, if s/he seriously consider IB job, will get at least one interview spot for sure, whatever his/her previous background is. Then, just like I said, it just opens a door for you. You still have to do your home work, show your knowledge and passion, in order to seal the offer.
8#
发表于 2003-8-1 12:10:00 | 只看该作者
Why Stanford?
1) Reputation
2) Overall academic strength
3) People/culture
4) West coast
...

I'll be dinged if I stop at that. I think the "why XYZ school" question should not include too much about the school (cuz the adcoms know more than any applicant), but should try to apply its strengths to one's professional and personal plan and preferences. It's an other version of the "Why you" question. Just my $0.01.
9#
发表于 2003-8-1 12:42:00 | 只看该作者
IMHO, the question is not "Why Stanford?", it's "Why Stanford should admit you?". It really doesn't matter what you say about "Why Stanford".
10#
发表于 2003-8-1 14:50:00 | 只看该作者
chipmunk, you have the point!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-5-13 10:11
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部