*携隐*小教室（继续回答大家的问题）

携隐

以下是引用leslie123456789在2005-2-28 15:31:00的发言：
xy jj，我已经告诉你邮箱地址和msn地址，但是我没受过你的任何邮件阿

因为成员的email地址是陆陆续续给的，我要等基本全齐了才发给大家，所以最近一直都没有给大家发邮件。今天我会把已有的通讯录发给大家，基本都全了。以后大家加强沟通交流啊。

携隐

我已经发出通讯录。

Ninger，你的msn邮箱给我退信，所以我发到你hotmail邮箱了

flyingsky，你的邮箱也给我退信，请另给一个。

sweetdream

用计时器时发现只能保存两个计时结果，正在郁闷时，偶家那位说，别气了，破解版的给你找来了……偶感动……赶紧上传与大家分享。

携隐

wow太好了!!!这真是个好东西.谢谢sweetdream!!!!

sweetdream

第三组阅读完成：全对(但之前我刚按自己的分组做完45-48篇，错1题，正好是第47篇的，所以第三组应该为错1题)，用时33分钟。

总结(很晚了，只能总结一篇，明天补上另外三篇的总结)：

RC OG7

题材：社会科学类

套路：评价一个人的作品(该作品内容中包含观点对比，可归纳为新老观点对比型)

作者对该作品的态度为正(+)评价：line 10 “excellent book”

逻辑简图：

D1：给出1896年与1979年出现的两个判决截然相反的两个案例。(强对比，为出题点)

D2：TS：L8-10。D1的案例代表了‘儿童社会价值的转变’----V. Zelizer (主要人物)的excellent book (+评价) PPC 的主要内容。详述该转变，跳读。(转变必然涉及对比，出题点)

D3：小Z认为该转变的起因(origin)既多且复杂(many and complex), line 24-25. 以下详述各种origin，跳读：…were all factors…Yet…was also part of ‘sacralization’ of children’s lives。(强因果，有题)

D4：小Z stressing the cultural determinants; takes issue with practitioners of the new “sociological economics” who…soly in terms of economic determinant...Z is highly critical of this approach… (小Z从cultural角度进行研究，反对P这帮人的纯粹从economic着手)。以下具体讲P这帮人研究方法，以及小Z如何不同意。(强对比，有题)

Jinhua

对不起大家，我来晚了。我想我快要死了，做阅读时平均每篇文章要用30分钟才能做完，本来读文章时就有点晕了，等到看题目时就不知所云。而且每篇文章最多就只有2题是正确的。真的很没感觉。携隐mm让我做难题总结，可是我怎么就觉得每题都那么难哩。

cocoabean

以下是引用sweetdream在2005-2-28 16:05:00的发言：

用计时器时发现只能保存两个计时结果，正在郁闷时，偶家那位说，别气了，破解版的给你找来了……偶感动……赶紧上传与大家分享。

早晨起来先报各到, sweetdream MM的计时器我以前在电脑上装过一个版本, 但一直没有使用save功能, 刚发现好像只能保存一个时间呀, MM可不可以解释一下破解版和以前版本的区别呀? 能同时保存N个结果嘛?

谢谢

携隐

cocoa早～～～你又开始新的一天了，羡慕，我今天状态差（工作的原因），到现在还没开始做阅读。但是任务一定完成，现在硬着头皮去做～～～

P.S. sweetdream的计时器是可以保存所有记录的，babypace的那个只能保存前两条。

携隐

呼~~~终于完成今天的任务了.  困死了, 睡觉去, 明天上班再贴体会.

cocoabean

Help: 第三组的OG47-281蒙对了, 可现在看不懂ETS的解释, 一直高不明白a questionable (可疑的, ) assumption是啥意思??? OG只是解释说 The author points out his assumption within the context of criticizing the conventional theory about financial markets. 这和 a questionable (可疑的, ) assumption (题目) 和答案 D perfectly well informed about the market 有什么联系呀???

Passage 116 (16/17) OG47-DQ116

The function of capital markets is to facilitate an exchange of funds among all participants, and yet in practice we find that certain participants are not on a par with others. Members of society have varying degrees of market strength in terms of information they bring to a transaction, as well as of purchasing power and creditworthiness, as defined by lenders.

For example, within minority communities, capital markets do not properly fulfill their functions; they do not provide access to the aggregate flow of funds in the United States. The financial system does not generate the credit or investment vehicles needed for underwriting economic development in minority areas. The problem underlying this dysfunction is found in a rationing mechanism affecting both the available alternatives for investment and the amount of financial resources. This creates a distributive mechanism penalizing members of minority groups because of their socioeconomic differences from others. The existing system expresses definite socially based investment preferences that result from the previous allocation of income and that influence the allocation of resources for the present and future. The system tends to increase the inequality of income distribution. And, in the United States economy, a greater inequality of income distribution leads to a greater concentration of capital in certain types of investment.

Most traditional financial-market analysis studies ignore financial markets’ deficiencies in allocation because of analysts’ inherent preferences for the simple model of perfect competition. Conventional financial analysis pays limited attention to issues of market structure and dynamics, relative costs of information, and problems of income distribution. Market participants are viewed as acting as entirely independent and homogeneous individuals with perfect foresight about capital-market behavior. Also, it is assumed that each individual in the community at large has the same access to the market and the same opportunity to transact and to express the preference appropriate to his or her individual interest. Moreover, it is assumed that transaction costs for various types of financial instruments (stocks, bonds, etc.) are equally known and equally divided among all community members.

?*281.    According to the passage, a questionable (可疑的, ) assumption of the conventional theory about the operation of financial markets is that     

                                                                                                                                                                                                

(A) creditworthiness as determined by lenders is a factor determining market access

(B) market structure and market dynamics depend on income distribution   

假设中没提到,应在assume中找答案

(C) a scarcity of alternative sources of funds would result from taking socioeconomic factors into consideration

(D) those who engage in financial-market transactions are perfectly well informed about the market

(E) inequalities in income distribution are increased by the functioning of the financial market

281.

This question asks you to identify a claim about conventional financial-market theory that is made

explicitly in the passage. The best answer is choice D. The author points out his assumption within

the context of criticizing the conventional theory about financial markets. Choice A is not correct

because creditworthiness is mentioned in the first paragraph of the passage, but not in the context

of assumptions made in conventional theory. Choices B and E can be eliminated: with regard to

the consideration of income distribution, the passage states only that conventional analysis tends

to pay little attention to the topic. Choice C is incorrect because the passage does not mention any

assumption on the part of conventional theory with regard to the consequence of considering

socioeconomic factors.