【求助是在这里吗】上网对答案发现有GWD和LSAT2个不同答案。。。求大牛

343844842

Free public education is the best form of educationthere is. Therefore, we must fight to ensure its continued existence; that is,we must be ready to defend the principle of equality of educationalopportunity. Because this principle is well worth defending, it is clear thatfree public education is better than any other form of education.

Which one of the following illustrates the same weak reasoning as foundin the passage?

A.      I love music, and that’s why I listen to it constantly. I have mystereo or radio on every waking minute. Since I lay music all the time, I mustreally love it.

B.       Books are my most valuable possessions. My books are like myfriends---each pleases me in different ways. Just as I would give up everythingto save my friends, so too with my books.

C.      I would much rather be poor and respected than be rich and despises.To have the respect of others is far more valuable than to have millions ofdollars.

D.      I have never been betrayed by any of my friends. They have been trueto me through good times and bad. Therefore I will never betray any of myfriends.

E.       Because every plant I have ever seen has green leaves, I haveconcluded that all plants must have green leaves. This looks like a plant butit does not have green leaves, so it cannot be a plant.

A.       选项中，因为爱音乐总开着音响；又以开音响为事实，证明自己爱音乐；这和原题中的逻辑错误相似。原题中，因为公共教育好所以要维护该项制度；又以努力维护制度为事实，证明公共教育好。The fallacy in the passage is circle——自说自话。The best answer isA.

B.        选项逻辑上没有什么错误吧。

C.       观点虽然有些偏激，但逻辑错误与原文并不相同。

D.       以事实为基础，感恩图报，没什么错的。

E.        因为见到过的星球都有绿色叶子，得出因为没有绿叶，虽然看起来象星球也不是星球，推出荒谬的结论。其中的逻辑错误应该是以偏概全吧，这个选项迷惑性满大的。

Holly：查了LSAT答案为B，查了很多LSAT大牛解答，但是GMAT大牛选A，费解！个人偏向B。

原文说free e最好，因为prin值得保护，所以free e比任何都好。B为书最珍贵，因为像朋友，会不惜一切保护朋友，所以书也一样。

A不理解啊，请大牛们帮忙看一下~~

还有一题不明白Some people say that the scarcity of food is a function of the finite limits of the earth’s resources, coupled with a relentless rate of population growth. This analysis fails to recognize, however, that much of the world’s agricultural resources are used to feed livestock instead of people. In the United States, for example, almost one-half of the agricultural acreage is devoted to crops fed to livestock. A steer reduces twenty-one pounds of inexpensive grain to one pound of expensive meat. Thus, the scarcity of food is not merely a function of limited resources and population growth.

Which one of the following is an assumption that would allow the conclusion in the argument to be properly drawn?

A.        People prefer eating meat to eating grain.
B.        Meat is twenty-one times more expensive than grain.
C.        The limits of the earth’s agricultural resources are not finite.
D.        More than one-half of the agricultural acreage in the United States is devoted to drops fed to humans.
E.        Growing crops for human consumption on the acreage currently devoted to crops for livestock will yield more food for more people.

E is the best answer. 喂养牲畜消耗的粮食为人们创造更多的食物。（题目内容是：有观点认为食物缺乏是因为土地资源有限而人口数量却不断增多。但作者认为该观点忽视了农产品中有相当大一部分是用来喂家畜的。在美国几乎有一半土地的粮食是为了养家畜。1磅肉要用去21磅廉价的谷物。因此，食物缺乏不仅是因为土地资源有限而人口数量却不断增多。）

上面是答案，我不理解，选E不就是weaken了吗，也不是assumption啊??好费解啊