ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: Vivian1091

[Helr题库] helr逻辑笔记总结+使用心得( 11月12日杀鸡成功)

[精华]   [复制链接]
发表于 2019-3-21 10:25:30 来自手机 | 显示全部楼层
Mark一下
发表于 2019-3-23 15:14:36 | 显示全部楼层
感谢您的分享~
发表于 2019-5-7 02:53:44 | 显示全部楼层
up
发表于 2019-5-8 23:40:31 | 显示全部楼层
其实这就跟写作中的七宗罪如出一辙
发表于 2019-5-9 22:32:11 | 显示全部楼层
Mark一下!               
发表于 2019-5-12 14:10:56 来自手机 | 显示全部楼层
同意!
发表于 2019-5-13 15:04:51 | 显示全部楼层
Mark一下!               
发表于 2019-5-13 21:38:59 | 显示全部楼层
感谢分享!               
发表于 2019-5-15 21:34:21 | 显示全部楼层
thanks
发表于 2019-5-16 15:54:32 | 显示全部楼层
我想请教一个问题,不知道楼主还会不会看到回复呢
Technological improvements and reduced equipment costs have made converting solar energy directly into electricity far more cost-efficient in the last decade.  However, the threshold of economic viability for solar power (that is, the price per barrel to which oil would have to rise in order for new solar power plants to be more economical than new oil-fired power plants) is unchanged at thirty-five dollars.

Which of the following, if true, does most to help explain why the increased cost-efficiency of solar power has not decreased its threshold of economic viability?
按照helr的分类,将这题分类为因果推理,P是solar→electric经济实惠,C是threshold of economic viability for solar power应该降低。

我想请教一下这个因果推理是怎么得出来的呢? 谢谢回复啦~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-3-29 20:13
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部