- UID
- 887532
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2013-5-16
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
7#

楼主 |
发表于 2013-6-20 10:32:34
|
只看该作者
19 June
Independent Writing:
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important for government to spend money improving Internet access than improving public transportation.
Integrated Writing:
TPO25
When it comes to Internet, the majority of people believe that it is the greatest invention . More and more people consider that Internet is original force that we can ignore of the development of modern society . Many of us take into account that improving Internet access ought to be more important than improving public transportation. As for me, I don't agree with that.
Firstly, the Internet is not popularized worldwide espcially some less developed area . In these indigent districts , computers are not afforded by most of the people, let alone surffing on the Internet. If the government emarked on Internet developing as the primary task, there would be a huge amount of work such as the disseminating of the knowledge of Internet, the civilization construction of the proper use of Internet and so on. On the other hand , how nice it would be if the public transporatation were the top priority . In this case , people in the blocking regions would have contact with the outside world which is capatable to offer them Internet science itself. The more access they have to the modern world, the more knowledge they'll with easy effort. Public transporation is the foundamental basis of development instead of Internet.
Secondly , the investment of Internet will case the unfair situation for the people who don't use Internet. People seem to fail to take into account the fact that not all of us like Internet. There are still a number of people rejecting using it or using seldom. The contribution of government should be just for all the civilians in the jurisdictions. This action will probably cause unexpected situations which do harm to the harmony and unity of the society.
Thirdly,the more improved Internet will keep us from the real world. Form the picture that you are sitting on the sofa facing to your laptop, chatting with your foreign friends. When you feel tired , you can watch the photos of yourdream place to relax yourself without paying a cent or taking a step. No matter where you are and what you are doing, you can always order a tasty meal online ,which keeps you from the tiredness of going the restaurant. In view of such pleasant situation, people will definitely agree to improve Internet access but not public transpotation. From my view, the content lives offered by Internet is a chronic posion. So absorbed in the convenient life we are that we are losing something more important. Gradually you talk less to your family ,tired of hearing the local events, you become lazier that you no more want to take a journey to the dream land , satisfied by the beatiful pictures taken by others. What's worst is that you are abandoning the real pleasure of life , seeking for the fictional delight on the Internet. Maybe in the end the posion take effect to make you lose the interest of life and give yourself up to the computer games or online chatting. As a result , you life is destoried by Internet.
In sum,this is a matter of the people's livehood and the society's progress, a matter that no government can afford to ignore and this view is accepted by more and more people . In this case , it's not hard to see that what people need most and use generally should be the basic construct , public transportation, rather than the subsidiray product of highly developed society like the Internet.
|
|