ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2773|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG12 RC79题怎么推断出来的?

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2013-6-10 16:32:41 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Passage
Two works published in 1984 demonstrate contrasting approaches to writing the history of United States women. //(第一层:文章主旨句,点明中心思想,表明本文将比较二部作品的写作手法)Buel and Buel’s(出现人物名,注意) biography of Mary Fish (1736-1818) makes little effort (负评价词)to place her story in the context of recent historiography on women. Lebsock, (出现人物名,注意) meanwhile(结构词,后引出与Buel and Buel’s写法的不同), attempts not only to write the history of women in one southern community, but also to redirect two decades of historiographical debate as to whether women gained or lost status on the nineteenth century as compared with the eighteenth century(注意,与18世纪对比)//(第二层:对比Buel&Lebsock 写作方式的不同,注意作者态度倾向于Lebsock)Although(结构词,表让步) both(二本书的共同之处) books offer the reader the opportunity to assess this controversy regarding women’s status, only(表转折) Lebsock’s deals with it directly(正评价词). She examines several different aspects of women’s status, helping to refine and resolve the issues. She concludes(表观点的动词,后一般引出人物观点) that while women gained autonomy in some areas, especially in the private sphere, they lost it in many aspects of the economic sphere. More importantly(表递进), she shows that the debate itself depends on frame of reference: in many respects, women lost power in relation to men, for example(第一遍读文时可略读), as certain jobs (delivering babies, supervising schools) were taken over by men. Yet(结构词,表转折) women also gained power in comparison with their previous status, owning a higher proportion of real estate, for example.(举例 第一遍读文时可略读) In contrast(结构短语,表对比), Buel and Buel’s biography provides ample raw material for questioning the myth, fostered by some historians(插入语,可略读), of a colonial golden age in the eighteenth century but does not give the reader much guidance in analyzing the controversy over women’s status.

79.According to the passage, Lebsock’s work differs from Buel and Buel’s work in that Lebsock’s work
A.uses a large number of primary sources
B.ignores issues of women’s legal status
C.refuses to take a position on women’s status in the eighteenth century
D.addresses larger historiographical issues
E.fails to provide sufficient material to support its claims


为什么选D?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2013-6-16 23:47:15 | 只看该作者
Lebsock, (出现人物名,注意) meanwhile(结构词,后引出与Buel and Buel’s写法的不同), attempts not only to write the history of women in one southern community, but also to redirect two decades of historiographical debate as to whether women gained or lost status on the nineteenth century as compared with the eighteenth century
板凳
发表于 2013-6-21 00:51:44 | 只看该作者
She examines several different aspects of women’s status, helping to refine and resolve the issues.

Buel and Buel’s biography provides ample raw material for questioning the myth, fostered by some historians, of a colonial golden age in the eighteenth century but does not give the reader much guidance in analyzing the controversy over women’s status.

明显的做对比


地板
发表于 2015-7-28 19:32:33 | 只看该作者
he examines several different aspects of women’s status, helping to refine and resolve the issues. She concludes(表观点的动词,后一般引出人物观点) that while women gained autonomy in some areas, especially in the private sphere, they lost it in many aspects of the economic sphere. More importantly(表递进), she shows that the debate itself depends on frame of reference: in many respects, women lost power in relation to men, for example(第一遍读文时可略读), as certain jobs (delivering babies, supervising schools) were taken over by men. Yet(结构词,表转折) women also gained power in comparison with their previous status, owning a higher proportion of real estate



为什么这一段是说19世纪女性特点,而不是说18世纪???
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-9-6 09:36
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部