这段话我也看了好久 有一点想法,还请各位指教。 联系后面的第3题(类比题),我的对handicaps的理解是:由于美国独立战争是从1775到1783年(常识),因此在战争第二年出版的评述美国独立的书显然是过于早了。那么说明W的作品也犯了同样的错误:审判刚刚宣布几个月,他就发表了作品。相应的,第3题的选项C:总统刚刚上任,就评估其历史重要性。上述均with accuracy or the dangers of historical anachronism。 3. Which of the following is the best example of writing that is likely to be subject to the kinds of “handicaps” referred to in line 27? (A) A history of an auto manufacturing plant written by an employee during an auto-buying boom (B) A critique of a statewide school-desegregation plan written by an elementary school teacher in that state (C) A newspaper article assessing the historical importance of a United States President written shortly after the President has taken office (D) A scientific paper describing the benefits of a certain surgical technique written by the surgeon who developed the technique(C) (E) Diary entries narrating the events of a battle written by a soldier who participated in the battle |