|
Both Internet and public transportation plays(这里用单数好像不太合适哇？) an important role in modern life. Some people take it for granted that government should pay money to elevate Internet access speed and the number of hot spots rather than to support the improvement of public transportation. Considering the contribution of Internet, this idea makes some sense. However, based on the facts below, I counter this assertion with my opinion: supporting the improvement of public transportation should be in priority of government budget.
Firstly, the main traffic of Internet has been filled with things of less importance, whlie（while） the main capacity of public transportation has been used to support economy and production. Based on researches made by several major Internet companies, nearly three quarters of network traffic, shameful though, is occupied by downloading pornographic videos and pictures, or uesd（used） to spread affairs（没太理解spread affairs） and junk mails. On the other hand, the number of people relying on public transportation for daily routine is increasing, for it is a wise solution for（to） traffic jam and a result of public awareness of environmental protection. Public transportation overrides Internet in working efficiency and contribution. Therefore, it is reasonable that government budget supports public transportation preferentially.
Secondly, generally speaking, current network bandwidth meets the social demand, while public transport capacity fails in meeting social requirement. Take China for example. Even in a countryside Internet bar you can watch a video on line or play online games smoothly. But during the spring festival, millions of people rush to train stations to go home, breaking down the railway transportation system immediately. Needless to say, innumerable people for work are stuck in metro stations every morning, just hoping the train comes faster and are not full. Had people ever understood the importance of public transportation and forced the government to support it in priority, such situations would never have happened. Therefore, it is necessary that financial support should be paid(pay support的搭配好像不对哈) to the improvement of public transportation firstly.
Admittedly, despite the low efficiency, Internet has contributed to our society profoundly. However, capital for the improvement of Internet access should be dealed（dealt） with related companies and their commercial methods, leaving the government budget for more necessary expenses, such as improving public transportation. Only by facing commercial competitions directly can Internet companies become strong and competitive. Intel and AMD have received few support（由于support是可数的，一般使用few supports或者little support） from the American government, and they both have grown into hi-tech tycoons. While the governmental supported processor design project "Longxin" in China has been totally a failure. Therefore, there is few need for government to support the improvement of Internet financially.
From the three issues I mentioned above we can easily draw a conclusion that the importance of government's financial support on public transportation overrides the necessity of improving Internet access. Those who concerns only about theirselves（themselves）, ignore the public need and hold the opposite viewpoint should rethink and accept the truth.
不好意思，我把任务看错了，所以给亲改晚了。不过感觉亲写得很好，条例很清楚，表达也很顺畅！ | 
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2013-6-19 06:26:15
楼主
