ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: lj_hq
打印 上一主题 下一主题

gwd-24-29

[复制链接]
21#
发表于 2006-10-22 19:31:00 | 只看该作者

就像laywer说的evaluate加强或削弱 那么用他因就不会是无关 D对我说来很好的选项

22#
发表于 2006-11-8 10:46:00 | 只看该作者

我觉得B和D都有道理

请nn讲讲 到底是哪一个

23#
发表于 2006-11-11 19:51:00 | 只看该作者

我觉得B和D都有道理

请nn讲讲 到底是哪一个

24#
发表于 2006-12-29 10:56:00 | 只看该作者

支持lawyer所说。。。

25#
发表于 2006-12-29 12:53:00 | 只看该作者

D is the answer

B is not since it has been mentioned in the argument that new seeds require far less insectcides.

26#
发表于 2007-1-10 10:27:00 | 只看该作者

原来选B的,看了gonghao的才觉得B太牵强了,文章说的是far less 农药,而B选项只是说了large,没有说有多large,large1倍也是large,large100倍也是large。所以B不如D来的好,如果农药用得少,但产出产的比原来少,那肯定就不能norm了ma~~profit是根本阿~~~所以D来得直接~~

support D~~

27#
发表于 2007-9-6 17:45:00 | 只看该作者

29. 我支持B

Plant scientists have been able to genetically engineer vegetable seeds

to produce crops that are highly resistant to insect damage. Although

these seeds currently cost more than conventional seeds, their cost is

likely to decline. Moreover, farmers planting them can use far less pes-

ticide, and most consumers prefer vegetables grown with less pesticide,

therefore, for crops for which these seeds can be developed, their use

is likely to become the norm.

新种子很能抵抗虫害. 原因: 1) 虽然新种子贵, 但今后成本会下降. 2) 用新种子可以少用很杀虫剂, 且多数消费者喜欢杀虫剂少的农作物. 结论: 所以, 在能长新种子的地方, 新种子的使用会普遍.

 

which of the following would be most useful to know in evaluating the

argument above?  问评估 - 评估应该是评估原文的因果逻辑关系是否成立.

B.     Whether farmers typically use agricultural pesticides in larger

Amounts than is necessary to prevent crop damage.

针对原因1), 如果老种子过量使用杀虫剂, 则新种子的成本很有可能低过老种子. 所以会被普遍采用.

针对原因2), 如果老种子过量使用杀虫剂, 则新种子可以少用很杀虫剂. 所以会被普遍采用.

D.    Whether seeds genetically engineered to produce insect-resistant

crops generate significantly lower per acre crop yields than do

currently used seeds.

新种子的产量问题 - 从常识看有关, 但与原文因果逻辑关系无关.

欢迎探讨!

28#
发表于 2007-11-1 22:11:00 | 只看该作者
UP
29#
发表于 2007-11-3 23:05:00 | 只看该作者

我也来说两句,支持lawyer,选D 

A.    Whether plant scientists have developed insect-resistant seeds

For every crop that is currently grown commercially

every错,等于没有加强和削弱

B.     Whether farmers typically use agricultural pesticides in larger

Amounts than is necessary to prevent crop damage.

无论是针对何种SEED农民都typical用大剂量,普通seed和seeds genetically engineered 都有可能剂量偏大,但是pesticide 用量比例变化,但量还是减少了

无论是针对何种SEED农民都typical用大剂量,普通seed和seeds genetically engineered 都有可能剂量偏大,但是pesticide 用量比例变化,但量还是减少了

C.     Whether plants grown from the new genetically engineered seeds

Can be kept completely free of insect damage.

与原文意思相反,原文已有答案pestcide减少,不是不用

D.    Whether seeds genetically engineered to produce insect-resistant

crops generate significantly lower per acre crop yields than do

currently used seeds.

正确答案,提出一个新的因素,产量,产量高加强结论,产量低了削弱结论

E.     Whether most varieties of crops currently grown commercially have

Greater natural resistance to insect damage than did similar vari-

eties in the past.

无关现在和过去比较


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-11-3 23:09:02编辑过]
30#
发表于 2007-12-13 15:22:00 | 只看该作者
请教C错在哪里啊?哎。。我的逻辑我的痛!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-4-10 22:16
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部