ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 4478|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

gwd4-23

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-12-5 20:38:00 | 只看该作者

gwd4-23

Q22 to Q25:


      Many managers are influenced by


       dangerous myths about pay that lead


       to counterproductive decisions about


Line       how their companies compensate


  (5)      employees.  One such myth is that


labor rates, the rate per hour paid to


workers, are identical with labor costs,


the money spent on labor in relation to


the productivity of the labor force.


(10)      This myth leads to the assumption that


a company can simply lower its labor


costs by cutting wages.  But labor


costs and labor rates are not in fact


the same:  one company could pay


(15)      its workers considerably more than


another and yet have lower labor


costs if that company’s productivity


were higher due to the talent of its


workforce, the efficiency of its work


(20)      processes, or other factors.  The


       confusion of costs with rates per-


       sists partly because labor rates are


a convenient target for managers who


want to make an impact on their com-


(25)      pany’s budgets.  Because labor rates


are highly visible, managers can easily


compare their company’s rates with


those of competitors.  Furthermore,


labor rates often appear to be a


(30)      company’s most malleable financial


variable:  cutting wages appears an


easier way to control costs than such


       options as reconfiguring work pro-


cesses or altering product design.


(35)          The myth that labor rates and labor


costs are equivalent is supported by


business journalists, who frequently


confound the two.  For example, prom-


inent business journals often remark on


(40)     the “high” cost of German labor, citing


as evidence the average amount paid


to German workers.  The myth is also


perpetuated by the compensation-


consulting industry, which has its own


(45)      incentives to keep such myths alive.


First, although some of these con-


sulting firms have recently broadened


their practices beyond the area of


compensation, their mainstay con-


(50)      tinues to be advising companies on


changing their compensation prac-


tices.  Suggesting that a company’s


performance can be improved in


some other way than by altering its


(55)      pay system may be empirically cor-


rect but contrary to the consultants’


interests.  Furthermore, changes


to the compensation system may


appear to be simpler to implement


(60)      than changes to other aspects of an


organization, so managers are more


likely to find such advice from con-


sultants palatable.  Finally, to the


extant that changes in compensation


(65)      create new problems, the consultants


will continue to have work solving the


problems that result from their advice.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Q22:


The author of the passage suggests which of the following about the advice that the consulting firms discussed in the passage customarily give to companies attempting to control costs?


              


Q23:


The author of the passage mentions business journals (line 39) primarily in order to


              



  • demonstrate how a particular kind of evidence can be used to support two different conclusions

  • cast doubt on a particular view about the average amount paid to German workers

  • suggest that business journalists may have a vested interest in perpetuating a particular view

  • identify one source of support for a view common among business managers

  • indicate a way in which a particular myth could be dispelled

  • 我觉得好像C,D都对啊?根据The myth that labor rates and labor


    costs are equivalent is supported by


    business journalists, who frequently


    confound the two.  For example, prom-


    inent business journals often remark on


    (40)     the “high” cost of German labor, citing


    as evidence the average amount paid


    to German workers和The myth is also


    perpetuated by the compensation-


    consulting industry,


    C不是也对吗?

    沙发
     楼主| 发表于 2004-12-6 19:26:00 | 只看该作者

    顶顶顶!

    板凳
    发表于 2004-12-7 03:31:00 | 只看该作者

    我不知道我的理解对不对

    就算是Many managers are influenced bydangerous myths about pay that lead to counterproductive decisions about how their companies compensate

    你也不好说a view common among business managers

    地板
    发表于 2004-12-7 12:48:00 | 只看该作者

    文章journalist的稀里糊涂使这一myth得到加强,没有主观的意思,说不好听是journalist无知。C说有interest,这个是臆断。

    而且我觉得做这种目的题,不光要看选项说得和原文是否一致,更重要是看他说得是不是作者的目的。显然作者是要点出造成这个myth的几个源头,其中就包括journalist,而不是要暗示什么。

    5#
    发表于 2005-2-20 15:00:00 | 只看该作者

    请教一下, 排除C中vested interest错误,考虑D中的问题,文中似乎并没有明确说,business manager的这种错误观点来自于journalist啊?

    下面这个句子只说,这个观点也被journalist支持,source从何而来?

    The myth that labor rates and labor costs are equivalent is supported by business journalists, who frequently confound the two...

    这个句子是说,这个观点也被journalist支持,"source"的说法从何而来?其中的equivalent,我个人理解为与business manager平行,而没有引导的意思,困惑中...

    6#
    发表于 2006-12-30 17:28:00 | 只看该作者

    這題答案應該是C,不是D

    D中的a view common among business managers文中沒提到

    不需要去做一些無謂的inference因為這題是structure題啊!

    而C中的perpetuating a particular view可以從The myth is also perpetuated by the compensation-consulting industry看出來

    這邊用到also perpetuate,就表示前面business journalists 也perpetuate這個myth了

    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

    Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

    手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-11-13 10:08
    京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

    ChaseDream 论坛

    © 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

    返回顶部