- UID
- 856478
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2013-2-11
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
2 20独立+ 综合
It is not rare to see the scene that some people dedicated all his energy and time on their jobs, while they sacrifice the precious time with their families and friends. Mostly, they prefer to attain the greater happiness from the jobs than the ones from the social life. I, however, have the opposite opinion. I am preferable staying with my family and friend if I can arrange my time schedule freely, because when I stay with my parents and good friend, it is easy for me to relax myself, and I can share my happiness and sad things with them. Hence, I think the happiness in the social life will impact more on me. To begin with, while you immerse in your accomplished work, you should also prepare to pay more energy and vigor to achieve further success, which will burden your mental pressure. In a sense, the sense of happiness that the job brings to you just adds more sad or difficult stuff in your further work, so you could hardly take it as a truth delight. Moreover it is much more difficult to achieve the happiness in the job than in the social life. When you stay with your family, a trivial thing, such as a good cooked dinner, or a new piece of clothes you parents buy for you, will mood you and bring a sense of cheerful to you. Anyway the threshold of happiness that brought by the social life is lower than by the job. Also, we can enjoy various kinds of happiness in the social life, which will enrich and improve our living standard, which also has a positive effect on one's work. If one only retrieves happiness from the tedious job, he will never experience the diversity life that the god has prepared for us, because he misses the beautiful thing in the daily life. Moreover, the happiness from the social life will boost one's confidence and ambition in the work. Take my uncle for an example. My uncle, who is a business man, opened a trade company in a town. In the finance crisis, his company nearly went into bankruptcy because of the decrease order from oversea. On the edge of his total defeat, my aunt persuaded him to have a vacation. During the vacation, he spent most of time with his family, and he enjoys the happiness with his family. The most important for his is that he found out that the big fortune that he possesses is his family. After the vacation, in the support of his family, he built up his confidence and sought more opportunities for his company. Finally, his companies revived and defeat the difficulty. Admittedly, under the pressure of society and the soaring living expense, a man should work hard to make his family have a happy life. However, we could not ignore the importance of happiness that comes from family and friends. If a man only retrieves happiness from the work, I think he is a selfish person. From what I have discussed above, we can safely conclude that social life will bring us more happiness than the job. The reason is that social life not only can bring us various kinds of happiness, but also can promote more happiness chances in the work.
2 20 综合正式set off
The professor in the lecture explores the issue of working five days a week for workers. However, he thinks that working five days a week outweight working 4 days a week,which contradicts what the reading states. And in the lecture, he uses three specific poingts to support his idea. First, even though the reading passage suggests that the shortened workweek would increase company profits and lead fewer costly errors in work, thje professor argues in the lecture that more money should be costed on training and medical benefit. This is because it will cut profit of company, which means more computers and working space are needed if more workers are working at the same time. Moreover, contrary to the statement in the reading that the country as a whole can benefit from providing opportunities to employees, the professor contends that some employees choose a four-day workweek, many more jobs will become available.then he supports this point with the fact that the company would rather choose a worker who can work 5 days a week. Fially, the professor asserts that working 4 days a week will reduce quality of life and possibility of working, which will hinder carrer future whereas the author of tyhe reading claims that the option of a four-day workweek would be better for individual employees.the professor proves that this claim is indefensible by pointing out that people will lose their jobs during economic downturn and company will promote who can work 5 days a week to management positions to ensure continuous coverage and consistent supervision for the entire workweek.
|
|