一跃三十一浩作文寂静！GMAT你非礼我！！~~~~(>_<)~~~~

irenayouyou

一跃三十一浩作文寂静！最后一战碰到换库/(ㄒoㄒ)/~~GMAT你非礼我！！~~~~(>_<)~~~~

      话说楼主在北京场考试~在大家意识到换库后，四周的抽气声和小声骂娘声此起彼伏╮(╯▽╰)╭中英文夹杂韩文的都有。。。楼主目测应该是和我一样早上没上CD看换库否滴小盆友╮(╯▽╰)╭我旁边一大叔很清楚地用四川话说了一句：我的机票钱儿。。。。

      挥完小手帕，甩干眼泪放个作文狗狗，我记得在9月份的时候看过，还是在10月份，大家考下古，是说一个公司前几年请了一群运动员当代言人，扩展了中老年人的消费市场，现在想进军年轻人市场，于是乎认为请一个年轻的POP STAR必成攻！

好了~楼主回馈完准备找块豆腐撞SHI。。。谁有~给一块吧/(ㄒoㄒ)/~~

zxfjacob

patpat~~LZ还记得逻辑阅读不？？

irenayouyou

阅读呢有一个是前几个月的寂静，是说从亚洲人怎么到美国大陆的，这个可以去考一下古。逻辑考的全部都是和大选有关的不然就是和农业有关的╮(╯▽╰)╭还有一个是最后一题，我记得很清楚，是一个人说大家吃一种富含某元素的套餐可以有效避免癌症，还做了个实验，说一组人吃这个，另一组人不吃，吃的一组得病概率低。另一人反对说可能是食品中的其他物质可避免，问SUPPORT这个反对的人说的选项，我选的是这个国家很多食品都富含这个元素，后面跟了一个很难的阅读，应该对。还有语法，考了a lot of ;plenty of ; abundance

百合倒影

LZ寂静很给力啊！顶起来~！

sparklelynn

楼主好可爱呀呀 雪菲这里有棉花糖 送你啊

fengyoyo

thanks

hujing92

楼主，求语法狗哈

盐水柠檬

狗主说的是不是这篇啊。。。
33*. American Native Origin的研究
by  qq341163712(v32)
说是由于坐船去美洲大陆的说法太不靠谱，科学家在多少年以前一直对此不以为然，普遍认为是在冰川时期从阿拉斯加走过去的。
然后根据研究，在多少年之前，不具备走过去的条件。然后在多少年（大概1000年左右吧）之后，就有证据表明美洲有人啦。
所以他们得在这段时间从北走到南。作者认为这样是feat（还是什么词的），大概就是说这个速度很不靠谱。
于是第二段就开始讨论，有人就觉得从海上划船过去挺好，不过划船的话，很难找到证据来证明。（这边是有题的，好像是个细节题）
因为有当初证据的地方被水淹了，成深海区啦。在最后就说什么，就挺有必要去探索深海区，发掘证据什么的。

Q1：主旨题，其中有一项就是给理由，要去探索深海区什么的，不过狗主没选这个，大家可以讨论下。
Q2：针对黄色部分的细节题


考古
人类何时到达美洲，还有争议。考古的发现显示的最早时间的14,700年前。
第 一个假说是，通过陆路。说人们可以通过COASTAL JOURNEY 沿海岸走，因为爱斯基摩皮船(kayak)太小不太可能做跨海的交通工具。由于ice age，人类不可能于15,700年前通过陆路到达美洲(讲了原因“冰呀，海呀什么的”)。还讲了什么向南走，一个月可以走20里。多少年后到了南美。但是旧观点有个问题，就是人移动的速度太快了不合理
第二个假说是，学者F提出的新观点：通过海路，支持的理由是坐船移动的速度合理。但是因为冰河融化，当时沿岸可住人的地区现在都在海底，即使有证据也被淹没了。转折，最新海底考古有证据支持沿岸的确有住人，但是这个证据对於支持海路说还是薄弱的。结论是陆路或海路尚无定论，但对於F学者提出的海路迁移开始时间点(14,000~15,000年前)是普遍被接受的。

Q1：有主旨题。
Q2：第二段全（假说部分）highlight了，问作用。
Q3：好像有个15,000到15,500的数字题~

参考文献
Transportation to the New World is a big topic for debate. 提出问题If the early Americans did cruise巡航 around the continent in canoes and kayaks, might the first settlers have arrived by boat as well? For decades the archaeological community rejected this notion (Ice Agehunters could never have carried all their weapons and left over mammoth meat in such tiny boats!), but in recent years the idea has gathered more support.旧观点反对经由海路假说
One reason for the shift: the nagging困扰的 problem of just how fast people can make the journey from Alaska toTierra del Fuego. 旧观点的问题症结点Consider Dillehay's 14,700-year-old Monte Verde site. According to the previously accepted timeline, people could have made the journey from Asia on foot no earlier than 15,700 years ago(before this time, the ice sheets extending from the North Pole covered Alaskaand Canada completely, making a land passage impossible). If this entry date is correct, the Monte Verde find would indicate that the first settlers had to make the 12,000 -mile trip through two continents in only 1,000 years. In archaeological time, that's as fast as Marion Jones(地球上跑得最快的女人). 提出反对旧观点的理由:行走速度太快? One way to achieve this pace , however,would be by traveling along the Pacific coastlines of North and SouthAmerica in boats. 转折, F提出海路假说新观点Knut Fladmark, a professor of archaeology at Simon Fraser University in Burnaby, BC, first suggested this possibility in the 1970s and remains an advocate of a coastal entry into the Americas. If people had a reason to keep moving, he says, they could have traversed both continents in 100 years. 支持理由:速度符合Fladmark estimates that traveling at a rate of 200 miles a month would have been quite reasonable; the settlers no doubt stopped during winter months and probably stayed in some spots for a generation or so if the local resourceswere particularly tempting. Fladmark's theory, though enticing won't be easy to prove. 让步,提出缺陷Rising sea levels from the melting Ice Age glaciers in undated thousands of square miles along the Pacific coasts of both continents. Any early sites near the ocean that were inhabited before 13,000 years ago would now be deep underwater. 新观点的弱点Recently a few enterprising researchers have attempted to dredge挖出 up artifacts from below the Pacific. In 1997, for example, Daryl Fedje, an archaeologist with Parks Canada (which runs that country's national parks system), led a team that pulled up a small stone tool from 160 feet underwater just off the coast of British Columbia. 提出证据证明新观点The single tool, which Fedje estimates to be around 10,200 years old, does establish that people once lived on the now submerged land but reveals little about the culture there. Excavating underwater sites might turn out to be the only way to prove when humans first arrived on this continent.提出对证据的质疑? And for many researchers this is still a very open question 因为证据力不足，海路说尚未定论, with answers ranging from 15,000 years ago to as far back as 50,000 years ago. When Fladmark first proposed the idea of a coastal migration, the entry date of 14,000 or 15,000 years ago was orthodoxy.公认的,持普遍赞同的
结论是有关F的新观点的开始时间点(14,000~15,000年前)是被普遍接受的

wswoshiwdw

有木有IR狗狗~~~

wswoshiwdw

楼主说的是不是这个作文？
The following appeared in the opinion column of a financial magazine.“On average, middle-aged consumers devote 39 percent of their retail expenditure to department store products and services, while for younger consumers the average is only 25 percent. Since the number of middle-aged people will increase dramatically within the next decade, department stores can expect retail sales to increase significantly during that period. Furthermore, to take advantage of the trend, these stores should begin to replace some of those products intended to attract the younger consumer with products intended to attract the middle-aged consumer.”财经杂志的意见栏： 一般而言，中年消费者的零售消费额的39％用于专卖店的商品何服务。而在年轻一些的消费者中这一比例仅有25％。由于中年消费者的数量在下一10年中将大幅增长，专卖店可以预期他们的销售额会有大幅增长。进一步，为利用这一趋势，这些店应该开始将一些吸引年轻消费者的商品替换为吸引中年消费者的商品。