ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: 果果428
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD 9-15 再问一下

[复制链接]
11#
发表于 2005-8-28 22:33:00 | 只看该作者
A的had become不就等于发生在joined前面了?这应该不对吧
12#
发表于 2005-9-2 15:44:00 | 只看该作者

Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff, Deborah Sampson, the first



woman to draw a soldier’s pension, joined the Continental Army in 1782 at the age of 22, was injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she had become too ill to serve.


是说ill 是在 discharged 之前,because she had become....是从属于第三个分句里的,不可能说她因为病得太历害 才参军,受伤 退役呀

13#
发表于 2005-9-6 09:45:00 | 只看该作者

同意楼上说的had become是从属于第三个分句的, 这个没问题. 但是这个过去完成时用得还是觉得有问题.


OG里所有对过去完成时的解释都是describes action that is completed prior to some other event described with the simple past tense也就是说在前一个过去的事情发生时就已经完成了.


如果放回本句, 那么就是在这个花木兰退役之前, 她的病重已经结束了. 逻辑上有问题啊. 病都已经过去了还存在什么too till to serve吗?!


D的过去时感觉更合适, 但是一个injure没有用被动的确也说不过去,咋整?


14#
发表于 2005-9-9 16:33:00 | 只看该作者

对这种破题,一个字忍

15#
发表于 2005-9-27 10:01:00 | 只看该作者

基础语法知识疑问:


主动joined,和被动谓语was injuredand ,..... was discharged能够形成并列结构吗?


这几天语法看晕了,最基本的也想不起来了,谁能给我解答一下阿?不甚感辑!

16#
发表于 2005-9-29 12:43:00 | 只看该作者

这题说一点我的看法:很多人质疑为什么在本题中,A选项中明明并列的两个动词injured 和discharged之间用了and还要用“,”;也有人问because she had become too ill to serve不可能发生在什么时候之前。


把两个问题综合起来看就清楚了:首先,she become too ill to serve 应该是指发生在was discharged in 1783之前,而既不是join也不是injure之间,换句话说就是仅修饰最后半个句子,所以作者在这里特意用“,”把后半个句子和前面一堆东东区分开就是为了避免歧义。


GMAT的题真是越看越有味道,有时让人有种拍案叫绝的冲动

17#
发表于 2005-10-8 04:33:00 | 只看该作者

Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff, Deborah Sampson, the first


woman to draw a soldier’s pension, joined the Continental Army in 1782 at the age of 22,


was injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she had become too ill to serve.


A. 22, was injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she had become
B. 22, was injured three times, while being discharged in 1783 because she had
become
C. 22, and was injured three times, and discharged in 1783, being
D. 22, injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she was
E. 22, having been injured three times and discharged in 1783, being


只能选A.


句子的主干是: Deborah Sampson joined ..., was injured..., and was discharged... because she had become...


这三个谓语动词是并列的, 并没有违法平行原则. injure 一定要用被动语态,是被别人injure的, discharge也要用被动语态,


and 的用法也没问题啊: a,b, and c.


至于because从句, 那是修饰discharge的, 用过去完成时是指become发生在discharged之前,是过去的过去.  再说, 如果because修饰全部的谓语,为了避免修饰歧义, 应放在三个动词的前面的.


D错在:1.injure没用被动语态 --- 光这一条就可以排除D了.


             2.was discharged in 1783 because she was too ill to serve 指1783年她病了以致于不能服役,因此被开了.----多么无情啊!才病一次或者那年才病了,就不能干了.   而A的意思呢, 1783年以前她就had become ill(原来是没病的,暗示受伤才使的她身体变差了与was ill 有区别),直到1783年实在不能服役了才退的.


18#
发表于 2005-10-8 17:40:00 | 只看该作者

in‧jure / ˈɪndʒə $ -ər / [transitive]
1
to hurt yourself or someone else, for example in an accident or an attack
ᅳsee also woundAngus injured his leg playing rugby yesterday. be badly/seriously/critically injured Two people have been critically injured in a road accident.
2
injure somebody's pride/feelings etc
to say unfair or unpleasant things that hurt someone's pride, feelings etc
see usage note damage 2

大家来看injure的用法,明显可以用主动表自己受伤了。。。所以说如果说D应该用被动就被排除了,肯定是不对的,相反逻辑意思上,D很好理解,参军,受伤,遣回因为病得不能服役了。

不理解A一定要用过去完成时表达他被遣回的原因。

所以我还是保留选D的意见



19#
发表于 2005-10-12 13:23:00 | 只看该作者

我选D, injure ----> become ill, 如果用过去完成时就变成生病在负伤之前了, 逻辑意思不对啊。


请NN指教.

20#
发表于 2005-10-19 09:58:00 | 只看该作者

选A,并列结构

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-4-26 03:35
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部