GWD 9-15 再问一下

balabaladou7

新PREP已给出答案：A

下面是我的分析，请指正：

Dressed…, Deborah Sampson,…, joined..., was injured..., and was discharged...because she had become…

 

A. MingLiU","serif"; mso-ascii-font-family: Tahoma; mso-hansi-font-family: Tahoma; mso-bidi-font-family: Tahoma;">正确。3MingLiU","serif"; mso-ascii-font-family: Tahoma; mso-hansi-font-family: Tahoma; mso-bidi-font-family: Tahoma;">动词词组平行，had becomeMingLiU","serif"; mso-ascii-font-family: Tahoma; mso-hansi-font-family: Tahoma; mso-bidi-font-family: Tahoma;">时态正确使用，表示"had become ill" happened before and was the reason of "was discharged"MingLiU","serif"; mso-ascii-font-family: Tahoma; mso-hansi-font-family: Tahoma; mso-bidi-font-family: Tahoma;">。

B. MingLiU","serif"; mso-ascii-font-family: Tahoma; mso-hansi-font-family: Tahoma; mso-bidi-font-family: Tahoma;">使用whileMingLiU","serif"; mso-ascii-font-family: Tahoma; mso-hansi-font-family: Tahoma; mso-bidi-font-family: Tahoma;">，前面都逗号应改为andMingLiU","serif"; mso-ascii-font-family: Tahoma; mso-hansi-font-family: Tahoma; mso-bidi-font-family: Tahoma;">；while being dischargedMingLiU","serif"; mso-ascii-font-family: Tahoma; mso-hansi-font-family: Tahoma; mso-bidi-font-family: Tahoma;">不是独立句子，而且可能产生修饰前面两个动词的歧义。

C. 第一个and多余，应改为逗号；being做状语不能合理体现时态，有一直在…的意思，表持续，而且being+adj 使用不简洁。

D. injureMingLiU","serif"; mso-ascii-font-family: Tahoma; mso-hansi-font-family: Tahoma; mso-bidi-font-family: Tahoma;">需要被动形式，既变成形容词，因为injureMingLiU","serif"; mso-ascii-font-family: Tahoma; mso-hansi-font-family: Tahoma; mso-bidi-font-family: Tahoma;">是及物动词，后面一定要跟宾语，或者就injure sb；was动词时态错误，应该had become。

E. having 短语可能产生修饰前面动词的歧义；in 1783的位置产生歧义—在1783年伤了3次；being不简洁，having和being之间没有连词。

 

deliank

以下是引用michellechang在2005-8-22 13:59:00的发言：

我也选D，不过现在我觉得D不对，因为很明显三个动作是有逻辑顺序的，参军，受伤，退役，应该用并列动词。

因此三个动词需要并列，不应该把injure单独作为分词后置
        故排除D

初夏的味道

injure的用法是什么？

可爱的小宝宝

people (who are) injured ,这句话把who are 省略了 所以其实是被动语态 你认为的是这里的injured是主动语态的过去时是不对的

cptiger

Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff, Deborah Sampson, the first

woman to draw a soldier’s pension, joined the Continental Army in 1782 at the age of 22,

was injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she had become too ill to serve.

A. 22, was injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she had become
B. 22, was injured three times, while being discharged in 1783 because she had
become
C. 22, and was injured three times, and discharged in 1783, being
D. 22, injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she was
E. 22, having been injured three times and discharged in 1783, being

只能选A.

句子的主干是: Deborah Sampson joined ..., was injured..., and was discharged... because she had become...

这三个谓语动词是并列的, 并没有违法平行原则. injure 一定要用被动语态,是被别人injure的, discharge也要用被动语态,

and 的用法也没问题啊: a,b, and c.

至于because从句, 那是修饰discharge的, 用过去完成时是指become发生在discharged之前,是过去的过去.  再说, 如果because修饰全部的谓语,为了避免修饰歧义, 应放在三个动词的前面的.

D错在:1.injure没用被动语态 --- 光这一条就可以排除D了.

            2.was discharged in 1783 because she was too ill to serve 指1783年她病了以致于不能服役,因此被开了.----多么无情啊!才病一次或者那年才病了,就不能干了.   而A的意思呢, 1783年以前她就had become ill(原来是没病的,暗示受伤才使的她身体变差了与was ill 有区别),直到1783年实在不能服役了才退的.

-- by 会员 seekmydream (2005/10/8 4:33:00)

我觉得 seekmydream 的解答最为明确

luhanqi

我觉得能不能把joined...理解成插入语？这样跟后面动词的平行句不会有主被动的歧义了。。。

龙泽

我对这个题选A还是有些保留意见，或许这个题本身出得并不太好
D选项injured three times 做伴随状语，joined the Continental Army in 1782，和and was discharged in 1783 两个句子从时间状语in 1782 和in 1783上看结构更倾向于平行
当然A选项没什么问题，但D选项似乎也能解释通