ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1128|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG12第26 题对modier的诸多疑问,求解

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-12-4 10:33:19 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
OG12.26
Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering her letters to anyone else.


A,Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering

B,Dickinson were written over a period that begins a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ended shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber

C,Dickinson, written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and that ends shortly before Emily’s death in 1886and outnumbering

D,Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother, ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, and outnumbering

E,Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber

这题ron大神说:
this is exactly the problem: the phrase in question, "outnumbering ...", is NOT, in any way whatsoever, a "(direct/indirect) result" of the time period over which the letters were written. these are tw completely independent and unrelated observations about the letters, and so they can't be placed into the sort of construction that appears in choice (a). this is thus not a grammatical problem so much as a problem of clarity, but it's still a problem
我想问numbering在这里不是做状语?而是应该做定语修饰letters吗,是因为outnumbering离主语太远了,(中间没什么别的可修饰了啊)?那终于原文的意思,主句是were written
啊,不是主句吗?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2012-12-4 13:47:48 | 只看该作者
outnumbering是屬於present participle with comma,在句子中作為verb modifier修飾主句動作以及主句。
另外,如果outnumbering要修飾前面的名詞的話(這時是做noun modifier),應該要符合touch rule的原則,就近放在noun後面(有時候可以跳躍),而且不能加comma。

這裡Ron的意思是說,E給S的信were written,所造成的結果不是數量超過E給其他任何人的信。“寫信”和“數量超過”應該是兩個獨立的事情,沒有因果關係。
^^
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2012-12-4 15:19:10 | 只看该作者
啊 manhattan里讲过,我复习的混乱了。。。谢啦同学
地板
发表于 2013-1-29 03:22:12 | 只看该作者
outnumbering是屬於present participle with comma,在句子中作為verb modifier修飾主句動作以及主句。
另外,如果outnumbering要修飾前面的名詞的話(這時是做noun modifier),應該要符合touch rule的原則,就近放在noun後面(有時候可以跳躍),而且不能加comma。

這裡Ron的意思是說,E給S的信were written,所造成的結果不是數量超過E給其他任何人的信。“寫信”和“數量超過”應該是兩個獨立的事情,沒有因果關係。
^^
-- by 会员 TerraceHo (2012/12/4 13:47:48)



我做题的时候怎么就不知道区别 这两个是独立的事件这个原则
5#
发表于 2013-1-29 14:34:54 | 只看该作者
outnumbering是屬於present participle with comma,在句子中作為verb modifier修飾主句動作以及主句。
另外,如果outnumbering要修飾前面的名詞的話(這時是做noun modifier),應該要符合touch rule的原則,就近放在noun後面(有時候可以跳躍),而且不能加comma。

這裡Ron的意思是說,E給S的信were written,所造成的結果不是數量超過E給其他任何人的信。“寫信”和“數量超過”應該是兩個獨立的事情,沒有因果關係。
^^
-- by 会员 TerraceHo (2012/12/4 13:47:48)



解释的非常正确,顶一下!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-12 00:47
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部