ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 4458|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

菜鸟疑惑跪求解答!!!!!!!!!!

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-11-6 19:28:58 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
刚开始准备AWA发现无从下手啊。比如说 题目中由A→B
我是说这个逻辑链的问题呢 还是可以直接说A就有问题呢?还是当做FACT呢?像CR一样。。
如下题。

"Scientists must typically work 60 to 80 hours a week if they hope to further their careers; consequently, good and affordable all-day child care must be made available to both male and female scientists if they are to advance in their fields. Moreover, requirements for career advancement must be made more flexible so that preschool-age children can spend a significant portion of each day with a parent."


我可以说第一句话就是错的吗?
我感觉在这里是像FACT一样。。


另一道题。
"Motorcycle X has been manufactured in the United States for more than 70 years. Although one foreign company has copied the motorcycle and is selling it for less, the company has failed to attract motorcycle X customers—some say because its product lacks the exceptionally loud noise made by motorcycle X. But there must be some other explanation. After all, foreign cars tend to be quieter than similar American-made cars, but they sell at least as well. Also, television advertisements for motorcycle X highlight its durability and sleek lines, not its noisiness, and the ads typically have voice-overs or rock music rather than engine-roar on the sound track."


我可以说 After all, foreign cars tend to be quieter than similar American-made cars, but they sell at least as well.
这句话是错的吗?


这样看来 题目中的每一句话都可以说是错的啊。。。。如果没有给出EVIDENCE 来SUPPORT的话。
这个ARGUMENT Motorcycle X has been manufactured in the United States for more than 70 years. Although one foreign company has copied the motorcycle and is selling it for less, the company has failed to attract motorcycle X customers—some say because its product lacks the exceptionally loud noise made by motorcycle X.  这部分是FACT 那后面的都是ARGUMENT都是可以反驳的??


我知道这个问题很菜鸟。。很纠结。
还跪求解答!!


谢谢啊!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

收藏收藏1 收藏收藏1
沙发
发表于 2012-11-6 19:34:17 | 只看该作者
一般来说都是攻击逻辑链

A----B


有效的攻击点是A推不出B


而不是单独攻击A.B的有效性


真的只是个人意见...
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2012-11-6 19:38:04 | 只看该作者
那就是不能说 科学家需要工作长时间才能成功 是错的咯???
地板
发表于 2012-11-6 19:42:33 | 只看该作者
那就是不能说 科学家需要工作长时间才能成功 是错的咯???
-- by 会员 alicezyk (2012/11/6 19:38:04)







就像你做CR一样


你把前提都给秒了


结论肯定不成立


CR的思路是前提推不出结论
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-11-6 19:44:45 | 只看该作者
那就是不能说 科学家需要工作长时间才能成功 是错的咯???
-- by 会员 alicezyk (2012/11/6 19:38:04)








就像你做CR一样


你把前提都给秒了


结论肯定不成立


CR的思路是前提推不出结论
-- by 会员 DUKB24 (2012/11/6 19:42:33)

  谢啦~~看来和其他童鞋告诉我滴不一样~~ 谢啦~ 我在MANHATTAN上也问了~坐等RON回复捏~
6#
发表于 2012-11-6 19:46:56 | 只看该作者
我觉得秒杀前提的话。。。

AWA就没有所谓存在的意义了
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-11-6 19:53:12 | 只看该作者
哈哈哈 说得好·~我也这么觉得··
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-28 10:12
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部