- UID
- 813161
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2012-10-1
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
The lecture discusses that new rules which published in 1990 changed whole archaeological field in Britain that refutes the main idea in the reading passage that the science of archaeology and old cultural artifacts faced with serious problems there. The new guidance improved situation in all three areas discussed in reading passage.
First, the professor opposes the idea in the passage that many valuable artifacts cannot be protested (拼写小失误)well. She argues that new guidance stated that before construction projects started, it had to been examined by archaeologists to see if this site is interesting or valuable. If it is, the next step was that builder, archaeologists and local government have to work together and do plans to preserve artifacts and important site.还有细节吧
Furthermore, while the passage declares that archeologists suffered a bad financial supports and could not be paid by government any more, the professor contradicts this by saying that any worker in this field could be paid by Construction Company but not by government. Additionally, the company also could pay everything included examining and other works under this constructions project. Besides, she mentions that company provided funding to allow archaeologist to work far-growing what they could not do in the past.
Finally, the passage asserts that the career fell in trouble in Britain due to unpaid work and less positions, but the lecture rebuts the idea and saying that the new statement ruled that company paid all for archaeological works, such as evaluating preserved area, doing plans, professor manner(?这个我也没听好), processing date and writing report or article. A lot of unpaid works didn't process before but can be done now. What’s more, increasing work opportunity absolutely increased the number of worker in archaeology.
点都全没问题,挺好的,我想请教你一个问题,就是你的综合写作之后,你是先对照材料检查对一下点全不全,还是就检查完语法,就完了哈,
|
|