(OG10-19)In addition to having more protein than wheat does, (B选项)rice has protein of higher quality than that in wheat, with more of the amino acids essential to the human diet.
(GWD-29-24)According to recent studies comparing the nutritional value of meat from wild animals and meat from domesticated animals, wild animals have less total fat than livestock fed on grain and more of a kind of fat thought to be good for cardiac health.
根据笔记的解释,第一句比较的是protein,所以后面要加上 that in wheat;第二句比较的是wild animals和livestock,所以不加that of在 livestock前。。。可是我的理解是:(取关键词理解) 第一句rice has protein of higher quality than that in wheat 第二句wild animals have less total fat than (that of) livestock 两句一个基本一样,一个比较protein,一个比较fat。。。
宾语比较,一般加that/those,避免歧义 1. In addition to having more protein than wheat does, rice has protein of higher quality than that in wheat, with more of the amino acids essential to the human diet. 假如你这道题,不添加that,则变成rice has protein of higher quality than wheat,产生歧义; 2.wild animals have less total fat than (that of) livestock,假如这道题你不加,不会有任何歧义,主语和主语就同一宾语在比较。。。。。
1.rice has protein of higher quality than that in wheat 2.wild animals have less total fat than livestock 第一句比较的是宾语,要补出that;第二句比较的是主语,不需要补出。根据than前半部分比较级的位置,即可判断要比较的主体,前面是主谓,比较的是主语则不需要补出;前面是主谓宾比较的是宾语时,则需要补出。 但是和您说一句,这种所谓的原则,有时候GMAT本身都会违反,所以确定是不是split,再来定是否语义meaning上有歧义,再定夺是不是要加that或者助动词,千万不要在未划线题目本身钻进去出不来。
1.rice has protein of higher quality than that in wheat 2.wild animals have less total fat than livestock 第一句比较的是宾语,要补出that;第二句比较的是主语,不需要补出。根据than前半部分比较级的位置,即可判断要比较的主体,前面是主谓,比较的是主语则不需要补出;前面是主谓宾比较的是宾语时,则需要补出。 但是和您说一句,这种所谓的原则,有时候GMAT本身都会违反,所以确定是不是split,再来定是否语义meaning上有歧义,再定夺是不是要加that或者助动词,千万不要在未划线题目本身钻进去出不来。
1.rice has protein of higher quality than that in wheat 2.wild animals have less total fat than livestock 第一句比较的是宾语,要补出that;第二句比较的是主语,不需要补出。根据than前半部分比较级的位置,即可判断要比较的主体,前面是主谓,比较的是主语则不需要补出;前面是主谓宾比较的是宾语时,则需要补出。 但是和您说一句,这种所谓的原则,有时候GMAT本身都会违反,所以确定是不是split,再来定是否语义meaning上有歧义,再定夺是不是要加that或者助动词,千万不要在未划线题目本身钻进去出不来。
宾语比较,一般加that/those,避免歧义 1. In addition to having more protein than wheat does, rice has protein of higher quality than that in wheat, with more of the amino acids essential to the human diet. 假如你这道题,不添加that,则变成rice has protein of higher quality than wheat,产生歧义; 2.wild animals have less total fat than (that of) livestock,假如这道题你不加,不会有任何歧义,主语和主语就同一宾语在比较。。。。。
-- by 会员 sisichen666 (2012/10/27 3:21:12)
sisi前辈 借题再问 C选项为什么不能补充出that of 对于比较结构 我背了一个例句便于分析 I eat more than you. I eat more apple than you do. 规则为主谓结构比较主语时可省略谓语,主谓宾结构比较主语时补充出谓语以便引起歧义.
本题只讨论BC选项 According to recent studies comparing the nutritional value of meat from wild animals and meat from domesticated animals, wild animals have less total fat than do livestock fed on grain and more of a kind of fat they think is good for cardiac health.
B.wild animals have less less total fat than livestock fed on grain and more of a kind of fat thought to be C.wild animals have less total fat than that of livestock fed on grain and have more fat of a kind thought to be 感觉C的补充更加完善 wild animals have less total fat than livestock会不会给人一种total fat和livestock在比较的感觉?
在引OG原题 Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi, in the form of carbon dioxide, and converting it to energy-rich sugars.
A. Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi,
B. Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than fungi,
C. Plants are more efficient than fungi at acquiring carbon,
D. Plants, more efficient than fungi at acquiring carbon, (C)
E. Plants acquire carbon more efficiently than fungi, B选项同样省略了 但是OG的解释是This sentence claims that plants acquirecarbon more efficiently than they acquirefungi, which is also nonsensical; the form ofcarbon dioxide still modifies fungi.
This sentence claims that plants acquirecarbon more efficiently than they acquirefungi, which is also nonsensical; the form ofcarbon dioxide still modifies fungi.