小作文考了两次都是fair,真心不知道是什么问题。希望有人能给点意见 通常我都是第一段,先说R的主旨,再说L的主旨。第二三四段就分别列出三个分观点,R一句,L两句。 附,写的TPO17的小作文,求指导~ Different from the opinion in the reading passage that the population of birds will be reduced by the growth of human population, the use of land and the use of pesticide, the point in the lecture indicates that the number of birds won't be less and less in the future.
First of all, the writer puts forward that the increase of human population and settlements will destroy the habitats of birds. On the contrary, the speakers says that the process of urbanization actually provide a better situation for some types of birds. For example, the number of hocks in city has increased a lot.
The second point in this passage is that the growth of agriculture will destruct the bird habitats due to the growing human population. The professor remarks, however, that there will not be increase in agriculture land using since new kind of crops have been introduced. This means there is no need to worry about the birds habitats.
Finally, the speaker disproves the reading's idea that the increasing usage of chemical pesticides will threat the birds. The professor disputes that scientists not only invented new, less toxic pesticides, but also invented pesticide-resistant crops, which are not harmful to the birds.