综合写作永远fair...求狠拍~求经验分享~~

afra17

tpo 2 开始~

In the passage, the author mentions the advantages of working in a group. However, in the lecture the speaker points out that according to a company’s research, the team work cannot bring us the advantages as we think before.

First of all, the professor contends that according to the research done by a company, the team members who really make a difference are overshadowed by the whole group. It is opposite to what is mentioned in the passage that every team member gets a chance to “shine”. As a matter of fact, the achievement is attributed to the whole group.

Secondly, the professor points out that it may take longer for the whole group to make agreement. When a great number of people involved, it becomes harder to make decision. In this case, the group work seems not to be efficient as the reading material says.

Last but not the least, in the lecture, some influential people in a group can make the work even worse because others may follow their thoughts and once those influential people think one idea will not work, other people may drop the case even though the case is worth trying.

先自评一下，感觉词汇变化少，句型稍显单一......
总觉得听力材料记不下来，很多都是听了意思后，自己写的，这样可以么？还是要尽量用听力中的句式或词汇？虽然说考paraphrase，但是用自己的语言来写总觉得内容不够充实....
跪求经验分享哇！

afra17

没人理我....桑心~~
接着贴~~跪求批改~~
字数是不是太少了....还是需要模板来充字数么.....?

tpo 4
The professor refutes the arguments which mentioned in the reading passage and gives out the evidences are contradictory to the reading materials.

To begin with, the professor points out the possibility that dinosaurs may live in Polar Regions where the temperature was much higher than it is now. In that case, even though dinosaurs were not endotherms, they were able to survive in that region. Also, if the Polar Regions became colder, those animals could migrate to a warmer place. In this point, it is possible that dinosaurs were not endotherms.

Additionally, the place of their legs doesn't prove that dinosaurs were endotherms, for their legs, under their bodies, were basically used to support their heavy body. In this regard, the speaker argues the structure of the body cannot be used as an evidence to prove that they were endotherms.

Thirdly, the professor contends that the bone structure cannot be considered as a proof. According to the professor, the growth pattern of dinosaurs is from rapid growth to no growth and then to slow growth. This periodic growth actually served as evidence that dinosaurs were not endotherms.

追梦CY

请加入写作小分队和队友互改
加油！

追梦CY

字数有点少，可以多描述一点听力部分的细节，建议加一个结尾总结。

afra17

谢谢建议~~我也觉得字数少了点，今天准备了个模板，凑了点字数。
今天字数稍微多了点，今天感觉没有时间写结尾了。

tpo 5

In the reading passage, the author deals with three different theories about the function of the Chaco structures. In the lecture, the same subject is discussed. However, the professor states that none of these theories are reasonable by using ample evidences.

To begin with, although these structures look like late apartments that native Americans live from the outside, the inside setting cannot prove they were used for living, for there are fewer fire places for cooking. That is to say, if there were hundreds of people living inside, it must have adequate fire places. While according to what has been found now, the number of fire places is only needed for ten families. Besides, the number of rooms is also not enough for hundreds of people. In this regard, the professor in the lecture cast doubts on this theory.

In the second place, the professor challenges the theory that Chaco structures were used for storage by illustrating that scientists cannot find any trace of maize or container for storing food.

Finally, the professor rebuts the third theory that they were used for ceremonial rituals. Even though, people find mound and other broken pots, however, there are many other things unexpected in structures such as sands and building materials. All these things seem being dumped by people, but not being used for ceremony.

追梦CY

我觉得听力的细节还是太少
不管怎么说如果你一段只能写出一句来有点失败
建议写完了听写一下原文 对照看看自己差在哪里
另外 如果一段真的记不到太多听力细节 那就适当写一句阅读的内容充实一下
多看看范文吧！

afra17

好吧~~我先去多研究一下范文~
谢谢你的建议！

afra17

字数增加了，打字压力变得很大。连着两天没能在20分钟内敲完.........
Q：听力里的词汇能直接放到作文里么？还是必须找近义词替换？
tpo 22~

The reading passage and the lecture are discussing the same topic whether ethanol is good to be used as an alternative for gasoline. In the reading material, the author mentions that many people are against the issue considering ethanol as an alternative. However, the professor in the lecture finds none of them is convincing.

To begin with, ethanol does no harm to our environment. Although the emission from the ethanol fuel is carbon dioxide, the main cause of greenhouse effect, the planting of some plants such as corn, a common source of ethanol, actually can counteract the effect. During the growth of these corns, they absorb carbon dioxide as nutrition. As a matter of fact, the producing of ethanol is not harmful to our environment. In this regard, the professor finds the flaw of what is mentioned in the reading passage.

Secondly, the large-scale of production of ethanol will not reduce the amount of food supply for animals. In the reading material, the author proposes that if 10 percent of the fuel comes from ethanol, a great number of animal food will disappear. However, in the listening material, the speaker refutes that the main component of the plants ethanol used is called cellulose. And most cellulose will not be eaten by animals. In fact, many plants can be planted for both alternative fuel and animal food.

Finally, in the future, the ethanol is able to compete with gasoline on the price. In the reading passage, the author says that the low price of ethanol is due to the government’s tax subsidies. In the lecture the professor argues that if there is a huge demand of ethanol, a large number of ethanol will be produced. In this case, when a great number of ethanol is available, the price will decline. The professor also mentions that if three times greater ethanol produces, the cost will decrease by 40 percent.