- UID
- 648077
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2011-7-6
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
今天看《新GRE写作5.5》 里面有一篇的argument的分析...和我自己的完全对不上 一看题目 上面是说写explanations that could rival the proposed explanations,(题目贴在下面了)。我分析的就是常规的,sick leave不等于健康问题,average age不等于长寿什么的,但是书上写的是对 that the relaxed pace of life in Leeville allows residents to live longer, healthier lives. 这个结论的不同解释,也就是除了Leeville缓慢的生活节奏还有其他原因造成了 文中那些论据的原因。他举了两地自然环境不同、两地人的心境观念不同、两地的经济结构不同等原因...那这么写的话 整个文章不就是和我本来要打算写的几乎完全不同了么...求解释。。。
There is now evidence that the relaxed pace of life in small towns promotes better health and greater longevity than does the hectic pace of life in big cities. Businesses in the small town of Leeville report fewer days of sick leave taken by individual workers than do businesses in the nearby large city of Masonton. Furthermore, Leeville has only one physician for its one thousand residents, but in Masonton the proportion of physicians to residents is five times as high. Finally, the average age of Leeville residents is significantly higher than that of Masonton residents. These findings suggest that the relaxed pace of life in Leeville allows residents to live longer, healthier lives. Write a response in which you discuss one or more alternative explanations that could rival the proposed explanation and explain how your explanation(s) can plausibly account for the facts presented in the argument
|
|