- UID
- 699376
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2011-12-6
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
The following apperared in a letter to the editor of the Parkville Daily newspaper.
Throughout the country last year, as more and more children below the age of nine participated in youth-league sports, over 40000 of these young players suffered injuries. When interviewed for a recent study, youth-league soccer players in several major cities also reported psychological pressure exerted by coaches and parents to win games. Furthermore, education experts say that long practices sessions for these sports take away time that could be used for academic activities. Since the disadvantages outweigh any advantages, we in Prakville should discontinue organized athletic competition for children under nine.
This argument is well presented and appears to be relatively sound at first glance. The editor recommends that they should stop organized competition for children under nine. To uphold this recommendation, the author cited that many young players suffered injuries and a recent study about youth-league soccer players. However, after scrutiny of this argument , I found that this argument rife with holes and unreasonable assumptions.
Initially, the author unnecessarily assumes that over 40000 of these young players through the whole country suffered injuries means athletic activities in Pravkville are disadvantage. Nevertheless, we do not know the detailed information about the children in Prakvilles. It is possible that the physical quality of children in Prakvills are relatively better than any other areas in the nation and then they are less suffered injuries during athletic competition. Besides, the author did not present the evidence about the extent of the injuries. We can confidently believe that the injuries were slight which can help student to experience the difficulties of life and then improve their resistance. In this case, these injuries were even advantage for children below nine. So the author's conclusion is unwise.
Furthermore, the editor cited a recent study which revealed that in major cities coaches and parents exerted pressure to yoth-league soccer players and assumes that the circumstances in Prakvilles are analogous to that in major cities. But it is unreasonable. It is entirely possible that there are many players and so keen competition in major cities which lead to more expectation of coaches and parents. But on the contrary, there are less players in Prakvilles and coaches and parents did not pay more attention on competition but happiness during participating in competition. Therefore, children may have less psychological pressure. Even indicates the circumstances in Praivilles, the study did not reveal the accurate evidence about these soccer players, we can imagine that they are over nine-year- old other than under nine. Without ruling out this possibility, the editor could not recommend children under nine will be not allowed for organized athletic competition.
Finally, the assumption that the students will spend the sports time on academic activities is doubt. Even if the students are not playing sports, they are unnecessary to do academic activities. It is entirely possible that the students spend more time on computer games or watch TV shows. If this is the matter, the discontinuing organized athletic competition seems to be disadvantage too. Without considering this possibilities, I remain unconvinced that the author's assertion is correct.
In summary, to make the argument more cogent and persuasive, the editor should provide more detailed information about the children in Prakviiles. And what are the age of the soccer players in the recent study. How to use the time which was used to sports for students after cancel the competition? Without considering these questions, the editor should not hastily recommend that they should stop organized athletic competition for children under nine. |
|