| 
 
UID699376在线时间 小时注册时间2011-12-6最后登录1970-1-1主题帖子性别保密 
 | 
 
| The following apperared in a letter to the editor of the Parkville Daily newspaper. 
 Throughout the country last year, as more and more children below the age of nine
 participated in youth-league sports, over 40000 of these young players suffered
 injuries. When interviewed for a recent study, youth-league soccer players in
 several major cities also reported psychological pressure exerted by coaches and
 parents to win games. Furthermore, education experts say that long practices
 sessions for these sports take away time that could be used for academic
 activities. Since the disadvantages outweigh any advantages, we in Prakville should
 discontinue organized athletic competition for children under nine.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 This argument is well presented and appears to be relatively sound at first glance.
 The editor recommends that they should stop organized competition for children
 under nine. To uphold this recommendation, the author cited that many young players
 suffered injuries and a recent study about youth-league soccer players. However,
 after scrutiny of this argument , I found that this argument rife with holes and
 unreasonable assumptions.
 
 Initially, the author unnecessarily assumes that over 40000 of these young players
 through the whole country suffered injuries means athletic activities in Pravkville
 are disadvantage. Nevertheless, we do not know the detailed information about the
 children in Prakvilles. It is possible that the physical quality of children in
 Prakvills are relatively better than any other areas in the nation and then they
 are less suffered injuries during athletic competition. Besides, the author did not
 present the evidence about the extent of the injuries. We can confidently believe that
 the injuries were slight which can help student to experience the difficulties
 of life and then improve their resistance. In this case, these injuries were even
 advantage for children below nine. So the author's conclusion is unwise.
 
 Furthermore, the editor cited a recent study which revealed that in major cities
 coaches and parents exerted pressure to yoth-league soccer players and assumes that
 the circumstances in Prakvilles are analogous to that in major cities. But it is
 unreasonable. It is entirely possible that there are many players and so keen
 competition in major cities which lead to more expectation of coaches and parents.
 But on the contrary, there are less players in Prakvilles and coaches and parents
 did not pay more attention on competition but happiness during participating in
 competition. Therefore, children may have less psychological pressure. Even
 indicates the circumstances in Praivilles, the study did not reveal the accurate
 evidence about these soccer players, we can imagine that they are over nine-year-
 old other than under nine. Without ruling out this possibility, the editor could
 not recommend  children under nine will be not allowed for organized athletic
 competition.
 
 Finally, the assumption that the students will spend the sports time on academic
 activities is doubt. Even if the students are not playing sports, they are
 unnecessary to do academic activities. It is entirely possible that the students
 spend more time on computer games or watch TV shows. If this is the matter, the
 discontinuing organized athletic competition seems to be disadvantage too. Without
 considering this possibilities, I remain unconvinced that the author's assertion is
 correct.
 
 In summary, to make the argument more cogent and persuasive, the editor should
 provide more detailed information about the children in Prakviiles. And what are
 the age of the soccer players in the recent study. How to use the time which was
 used to sports for students after cancel the competition? Without considering these
 questions, the editor should not hastily recommend that they should stop organized
 athletic competition for children under nine.
 | 
 |