Q1:二战时期federal为啥要建立育儿组织? 因为women都去industry that prepare wartime material。(反正把defense industry改写了一下)
Q2:相比其他州,战时加州被看护的孩子有啥特点?/ 战时加州育儿组织与其他州不同的地方?/ 有一个是是问加州和其他州在child care中的不同? they enroll disproportionately more children than other states
Q3:从加州的成功方法可以推出什么?/ 如果以下何种发生加州的success in child-care会被改变结果?/ 下列关于加州育儿组织的说法哪个是对的?/ 对加州这个育儿运动有啥infer?/ 问他们成功的原因? 对:it might not happen with smaller child-care resource pool =如果二战时加州育儿组织不庞大的话,战后加州的育儿组织就不会有优势 (?)如果加州没这么多center可能就不能成功了 (?)if the child-care funding was not so large. (错)it might not happen with smaller labor pool/如果加州没这么多人口可能就不能成功了;
Q4:为什么说“掏钱是为孩子不是为妈妈”?//needs of children care than working needs of women细节题? It's contradicting child's view that the new concept is from working mother's point of view. =这里强调从children的角度说服反对者即不是强调妇女自己的利益,而是强调的CHILD的利益