能帮我看看逻辑里这个句子吗？~要纠结死了！！！

sally9031

1) Whittaker: There can be no such thing as the number of medical school students who drop out before their second year, because if they drop out, they never have a second year.
Hudson: By your reasoning I cannot help but become rich, because there is similarly no such thing as my dying before my first million dollars is in the bank.

Hudson responds to Whittaker by

(A) showing that a relevantly analogous argument leads to an untenable conclusion
(B) citing a specific example to counter Whittaker’s general claim
(C) pointing out that Whittaker mistakes a necessary situation for a possible situation
(D) claiming that what Whittaker says cannot be true because Whittaker acts as if it were false
(E) showing that Whittaker’s argument relies on analyzing an extreme and unrepresentative case

a~有好心人来帮我翻译嘛？

sally9031

someone help me！！！

花花臭臭

W说：几乎就没有这样的事——医学院的同学在二年级以前辍学，如果他们辍学了，他们就再也没有二年级了。
H说：照你这么说我一定能变成富翁，因为我不可能在我没有赚够一百万以前死。
我觉得A和E都有点道理，

sally9031

谢谢这位同学！！！~可是我不懂这两个人说的话究竟是啥意思？···

sally9031

好急人啊··· ···

LoveYuLoveLei

W说因为退学了就不会再有第二学年了，所以都不会在第二学年开始前退学。（因为退学了就没有第二学年了）
H说不在赚到一百万之前死。（因为死了就赚不到一百万了）
两个比较很相似，但是第一个退不退学是能够掌控的，第二个人说的死不死是控制不了的。所以H说的他会变RICH的这个结论是站不住脚的。

sally9031

我懂了！！！非常感谢你~