ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 5273|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[讨论]GWD 4-22

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-10-31 02:08:00 | 只看该作者

[讨论]GWD 4-22


答案选A, 但是实在不能理解这里的“OFTEN"从何而来?   


Q22:


The author of the passage suggests which of the following about the advice that the consulting firms discussed in the passage customarily give to companies attempting to control costs?


              



  • It often fails to bring about the intended changes in companies’ compensation systems.

  • It has highly influenced views that predominate in prominent business journals.

  • It tends to result in decreased labor rates but increased labor costs.

  • It leads to changes in companies’ compensation practices that are less visible than changes to work processes would be.

  • It might be different if the consulting firms were less narrowly specialized.                                                                           Q22 to Q25:



  •       Many managers are influenced by


       dangerous myths about pay that lead


           to counterproductive decisions about


    Line       how their companies compensate


      (5)       employees.  One such myth is that


    labor rates, the rate per hour paid to


    workers, are identical with labor costs,


    the money spent on labor in relation to


    the productivity of the labor force.


    (10)      This myth leads to the assumption that


    a company can simply lower its labor


    costs by cutting wages.  But labor


    costs and labor rates are not in fact


    the same:  one company could pay


    (15)      its workers considerably more than


    another and yet have lower labor


    costs if that company’s productivity


    were higher due to the talent of its


    workforce, the efficiency of its work


    (20)      processes, or other factors.  The


           confusion of costs with rates per-


           sists partly because labor rates are


    a convenient target for managers who


    want to make an impact on their com-


    (25)      pany’s budgets.  Because labor rates


    are highly visible, managers can easily


    compare their company’s rates with


    those of competitors.  Furthermore,


    labor rates often appear to be a


    (30)      company’s most malleable financial


    variable:  cutting wages appears an


    easier way to control costs than such


           options as reconfiguring work pro-


    cesses or altering product design.


    (35)           The myth that labor rates and labor


    costs are equivalent is supported by


    business journalists, who frequently


    confound the two.  For example, prom-


    inent business journals often remark on


    (40)     the “high” cost of German labor, citing


    as evidence the average amount paid


    to German workers.  The myth is also


    perpetuated by the compensation-


    consulting industry, which has its own


    (45)      incentives to keep such myths alive.


    First, although some of these con-


    sulting firms have recently broadened


    their practices beyond the area of


    compensation, their mainstay con-


    (50)      tinues to be advising companies on


    changing their compensation prac-


    tices.  Suggesting that a company’s


    performance can be improved in


    some other way than by altering its


    (55)      pay system may be empirically cor-


    rect but contrary to the consultants’


    interests.  Furthermore, changes


    to the compensation system may


    appear to be simpler to implement


    (60)      than changes to other aspects of an


    organization, so managers are more


    likely to find such advice from con-


    sultants palatable.  Finally, to the


    extant that changes in compensation


    (65)      create new problems, the consultants


    will continue to have work solving the


    problems that result from their advice.


    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    沙发
     楼主| 发表于 2004-11-1 22:46:00 | 只看该作者

    藕重看了一遍文章,原来“ofen"是这样来的。作者从引出compensation company 那刻起,就用了大负评价,The myth is also perpetuated by the compensation-consulting industry; 接着用了三个大负例子来具体批判. 一是薪酬领域主要业务集中在薪酬领域上,不太可能提供其他实际上可行但不在 薪酬领域的建议。二是对于咨询公司的服务对象--manager 而言, 有关薪酬领域的建议更易执行,(即使没用)。三是在薪酬体系上的变动会生出新问题,咨询公司可以进一步咨询获利。

    综上,咨询公司经常不能实际上帮上忙。

    板凳
    发表于 2004-12-12 13:09:00 | 只看该作者
    地板
    发表于 2004-12-18 14:14:00 | 只看该作者

    谁要是再说选E,我就和谁急我。。。

    5#
    发表于 2005-9-1 15:19:00 | 只看该作者
    楼上太逗了。take it easy.
    6#
    发表于 2005-9-20 16:35:00 | 只看该作者
    E
    7#
    发表于 2005-10-2 20:31:00 | 只看该作者
    The answer should be A, absolutely
    8#
    发表于 2005-11-13 17:24:00 | 只看该作者

    The answer should be A.


    E would be true, if it was modified as follows:


    It might be different if the consulting firms were regardless of vested interest.


    在这篇文章里,公司的结果到底如何与consulting firm到底有多专业化关系并不强,不管consulting有多少specialized,由于他出于自身的利益,都会选择和公司说change the compensation system rather than make change in other ways.

    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

    Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

    手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-5-5 13:16
    京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

    ChaseDream 论坛

    © 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

    返回顶部